• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大活体供体库的“第一步”:对潜在肾脏供体被排除原因的分析

Expanding the living donor pool, "Ist Act": analysis of the causes of exclusion of potential kidney donors.

作者信息

Romagnoli J, Salerno M P, Calia R, Bianchi V, Pedroso J A, Spagnoletti G, Citterio F

机构信息

Renal Transplant Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2013 Sep;45(7):2632-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.001
PMID:24034010
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of a potential living kidney donor (LKD) leads to exclusion of at least 50% of candidates. The aim of this study was to analyze the reasons for exclusion of potential LKDs referred to our center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed historic and clinical data of all potential LKDs who were evaluated over 7 years from January 2005 to March 2012. Data were obtained by review of an electronic database.

RESULTS

Among 79 (50 female, 29 male) candidates, 24 (30.3%) successfully donated, comprising 22 related and 2 unrelated donors. We excluded 45 (56.9%), and 10 (12.6%) are actively undergoing evaluation. Reasons for exclusion were medical (n = 14; 31%), nonmedical (n = 18; 40%), positive cross-match (n = l7.7%), pregnancy (n = 2; 4.4%), and other reasons (n = 3; 6.6%). Of the 14 donors excluded for medical reasons, 75.8% were due to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or obesity and 21.5% to inadequate renal function, malignancy, or liver disease. Of the 18 (40%) excluded for nonmedical reasons, 6 (33.3%) were because the intended recipient received a deceased-donor transplantation before the evaluation could be completed, 5 (27.7%) because the recipient was no longer a candidate for transplantation, 5 (27.7%) because of donor withdrawal, and 2 (11.1%) for other reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive cross-match and deceased-donor transplantation during the evaluation process were the 2 most common reasons for LKD exclusion. Evaluation of potential LKDs is time consuming, requiring a remarkable amount of human and material resources. A dedicated pathway for the diagnostic work-up of LKDs may speed- the evaluation process and improve its efficiency, use of ABO-incompatible or paired-exchange donations may increase the yield of donor organs.

摘要

背景

对潜在活体肾供者(LKD)的评估会导致至少50%的候选者被排除。本研究的目的是分析转诊至我们中心的潜在LKD被排除的原因。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2005年1月至2012年3月7年间所有接受评估的潜在LKD的历史和临床数据。数据通过查阅电子数据库获得。

结果

在79名候选者(50名女性,29名男性)中,24名(30.3%)成功捐献,包括22名亲属供者和2名非亲属供者。我们排除了45名(56.9%),10名(12.6%)正在接受评估。排除原因包括医学原因(n = 14;31%)、非医学原因(n = 18;40%)、交叉配型阳性(n = 7;17.7%)、妊娠(n = 2;4.4%)和其他原因(n = 3;6.6%)。在因医学原因被排除的14名供者中,75.8%是由于糖尿病、心血管疾病、高血压或肥胖,21.5%是由于肾功能不全、恶性肿瘤或肝脏疾病。在因非医学原因被排除的18名(40%)中,6名(33.3%)是因为预期受者在评估完成前接受了尸体供者移植,5名(27.7%)是因为受者不再是移植候选者,5名(27.7%)是因为供者退出,2名(11.1%)是其他原因。

结论

评估过程中的交叉配型阳性和尸体供者移植是LKD被排除的两个最常见原因。对潜在LKD的评估耗时,需要大量人力和物力。建立专门的LKD诊断检查途径可能会加快评估过程并提高其效率,采用ABO血型不相容或配对交换捐献可能会增加供者器官的数量。

相似文献

1
Expanding the living donor pool, "Ist Act": analysis of the causes of exclusion of potential kidney donors.扩大活体供体库的“第一步”:对潜在肾脏供体被排除原因的分析
Transplant Proc. 2013 Sep;45(7):2632-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.001.
2
Reasons of preclusion of living-related donor renal transplants in Oman.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2010 Dec;8(4):303-6.
3
Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment.扩大活体供体库的“第二幕”:腹腔镜供肾切除术和ABO血型不相容肾移植改善供体招募。
Transplant Proc. 2015 Sep;47(7):2126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071.
4
Why Potential Living Kidney Donors Do Not Proceed for Donation: A Single-Center Experience.潜在活体肾供体未进行捐赠的原因:单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2019 Mar;51(2):504-508. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Characteristics of potential living kidney donors and recipients: donor disqualification reasons--experience of a Polish center.潜在活体肾供体和受体的特征:供体不合格原因——波兰一家中心的经验
Transplant Proc. 2013 May;45(4):1347-50. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.030.
6
Why Living Kidney Donor Candidates Are Turned Down? A Single-Center Cohort Study.为什么活体肾供体候选人会被拒绝?一项单中心队列研究。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 19;12(8):e9877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9877.
7
Eight years of outcomes of the Dutch Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program.荷兰活体肾移植交换计划的八年成果
Clin Transpl. 2011:287-90.
8
The utilization and advantages of an exchange donor program in living donor renal transplantation: a single-center experience.活体供肾移植中交换供体项目的应用及优势:单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):14-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.053.
9
Why Do Not All Living Kidney Donor Candidates Are Accepted for Donation? A Pediatric Center Experience.为什么并非所有活体肾供体候选人都被接受进行捐赠?一家儿科中心的经验。
Transplant Proc. 2023 Jul-Aug;55(6):1469-1472. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.040. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
10
The role of the altruistic unbalanced chain in exchange living donor renal transplantation: single-center experience.利他性非平衡供受者链在活体供肾移植中的作用:单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations in the Living Donor Collective Pilot Registry.活体供体集体试点登记处中活体肾供体候选者评估的结果
Transplant Direct. 2021 Apr 22;7(5):e689. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001143. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Why Living Kidney Donor Candidates Are Turned Down? A Single-Center Cohort Study.为什么活体肾供体候选人会被拒绝?一项单中心队列研究。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 19;12(8):e9877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9877.
3
The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review.
活体肾捐赠候选人评估的效率:一项范围综述
Transplant Direct. 2018 Sep 20;4(10):e394. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000833. eCollection 2018 Oct.
4
Comparison of accepted and unaccepted living kidney donors: one-center experience.接受与未接受活体肾移植供者的比较:单中心经验。
Ren Fail. 2018 Nov;40(1):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1450758.