• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者在首次住院期间进行分期非罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性。

Safety and feasibility of performing staged non-culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention within the index hospitalization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

作者信息

Loh Joshua P, Kitabata Hironori, Torguson Rebecca, Satler Lowell F, Kent Kenneth M, Suddath William O, Pichard Augusto D, Lindsay Joseph, Waksman Ron

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.005
PMID:24034862
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the same hospitalization as primary PCI is safe.

BACKGROUND

In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI, staged non-culprit vessel PCI at a separate session is recommended.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 282 consecutive STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI followed by staged PCI of the non-culprit vessel. Patients were categorized into staged PCI in the same hospitalization (n=184) and staged PCI at a separate hospitalization within 8 weeks of primary PCI (n=98).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, presentation of STEMI, and procedural characteristics were similar in both groups. Contrast amount was higher in the separate hospitalization group for both index (175 vs. 153 ml, p=0.011) and staged (144 vs. 120 ml, p=0.004) procedures. More staged left main PCI was performed in the separate hospitalization group (3.9 vs. 0.3%, p=0.008). Angiographic success of staged PCI was similar in both groups, with similar rates of vascular complications and major bleeding. Following staged PCI, in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (3.3 vs. 1.0%, p=0.43) and mortality (2.7 vs. 0%, p=0.17) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the safety and feasibility of staged PCI within the same hospitalization as primary PCI, achieving similar procedural success and in-hospital outcomes as staged PCI at a separate hospitalization. Higher contrast amount used during primary PCI and presence of left main lesion in non-culprit vessels may influence the decision to stage the PCI at a separate hospitalization.

摘要

目的

确定在与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)同一住院期间进行分期PCI是否安全。

背景

在接受直接PCI的多支血管病变ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,建议在单独的时段进行分期非罪犯血管PCI。

方法

我们对282例连续的多支血管病变STEMI患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者先接受了直接PCI,随后进行了非罪犯血管的分期PCI。患者被分为在同一住院期间进行分期PCI的组(n = 184)和在直接PCI后8周内进行分期PCI的单独住院组(n = 98)。

结果

两组的基线特征、STEMI表现和手术特征相似。单独住院组在初次手术(175 vs. 153 ml,p = 0.011)和分期手术(144 vs. 120 ml,p = 0.004)中使用的造影剂剂量更高。单独住院组进行分期左主干PCI的比例更高(3.9% vs. 0.3%,p = 0.008)。两组分期PCI的血管造影成功率相似,血管并发症和大出血发生率也相似。分期PCI后,两组的院内主要不良心脏事件(3.3% vs. 1.0%,p = 0.43)和死亡率(2.7% vs. 0%,p = 0.17)相似。

结论

我们的研究支持在与直接PCI同一住院期间进行分期PCI的安全性和可行性,其手术成功率和院内结局与在单独住院时进行分期PCI相似。直接PCI期间使用较高的造影剂剂量以及非罪犯血管中存在左主干病变可能会影响在单独住院时进行分期PCI的决策。

相似文献

1
Safety and feasibility of performing staged non-culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention within the index hospitalization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者在首次住院期间进行分期非罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.005.
2
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
3
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Index Admission for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Disease (Insights from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute STEMI Registry).ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者首次入院期间分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性(渥太华大学心脏研究所ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究的见解)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 15;116(8):1157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
6
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
7
Outcome of staged percutaneous coronary intervention within two weeks from admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者入院后两周内行分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E262-E268. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27896. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
8
Staged complete revascularization or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and diabetes.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉病变行分期完全血运重建或罪犯血管单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 17;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0923-0.
9
Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多血管病变和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多血管病变的比较:一项基于成对和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046.
10
Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者住院期间分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行干预的长期结局
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):188-195. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000701.

引用本文的文献

1
Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支血管病变ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中分期与一次性完全血运重建的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169406. eCollection 2017.