• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。

Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12144-3456, USA.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017
PMID:20129564
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in in-hospital and longer-term mortality for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease as a function of whether they underwent single-vessel (culprit vessel) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) or multivessel PCI.

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of patients with STEMI and multivessel disease is of continuing interest in the era of drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCIs in New York between January 1, 2003, and June 30, 2006, were subdivided into those who underwent culprit vessel PCI and those who underwent multivessel PCI during the index procedure, during the index admission, or staged within 60 days of the index admission. Patients were propensity-matched and mortality rates were calculated at 12, 24, and 42 months.

RESULTS

A total of 3,521 patients (87.5%) underwent culprit vessel PCI during the index procedure. A total of 259 of them underwent staged PCI during the index admission and 538 patients underwent staged PCI within 60 days of the index procedure. For patients without hemodynamic compromise, culprit vessel PCI during the index procedure was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than multivessel PCI during the index procedure (0.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.04). Patients undergoing staged multivessel PCI within 60 days after the index procedure had a significantly lower 12-month mortality rate than patients undergoing culprit vessel PCI only (1.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendation that culprit vessel PCI be used for STEMI patients with multivessel disease at the time of the index PCI when patients are not hemodynamically compromised. However, staged PCI within 60 days after the index procedure, including during the index admission, is associated with risk-adjusted mortality rates that are comparable with the rate for culprit vessel PCI alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)伴多支血管病变患者行单支血管(罪犯血管)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与多支血管 PCI 的院内和长期死亡率差异。

背景

在药物洗脱支架时代,STEMI 伴多支血管病变患者的最佳治疗方法仍具有重要意义。

方法

2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 6 月 30 日期间,在纽约接受 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 伴多支血管病变患者被分为罪犯血管 PCI 组和在指数治疗期间、指数住院期间或 60 天内分期进行多支血管 PCI 组。对患者进行倾向匹配,并计算 12、24 和 42 个月时的死亡率。

结果

共有 3521 例(87.5%)患者在指数治疗期间行罪犯血管 PCI。其中 259 例行指数住院期间分期 PCI,538 例行指数治疗后 60 天内分期 PCI。对于无血流动力学障碍的患者,指数治疗期间行罪犯血管 PCI 的院内死亡率低于同期多支血管 PCI(0.9%比 2.4%,p=0.04)。在指数治疗后 60 天内行分期多支血管 PCI 的患者,12 个月死亡率明显低于仅行罪犯血管 PCI 的患者(1.3%比 3.3%,p=0.04)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)的建议,即当患者无血流动力学障碍时,对于 STEMI 伴多支血管病变患者,应在指数 PCI 时采用罪犯血管 PCI。然而,在指数治疗后 60 天内行分期 PCI,包括在指数住院期间进行,其风险调整死亡率与单独行罪犯血管 PCI相当。

相似文献

1
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
2
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
3
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
4
Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多血管病变和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多血管病变的比较:一项基于成对和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046.
5
Staged versus one-time complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction.多支冠状动脉疾病患者非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的分期与一次性完全血运重建。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(1):12-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.974485. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
6
Safety and feasibility of performing staged non-culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention within the index hospitalization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者在首次住院期间进行分期非罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.005.
7
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Index Admission for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Disease (Insights from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute STEMI Registry).ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者首次入院期间分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性(渥太华大学心脏研究所ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究的见解)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 15;116(8):1157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry).ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间非梗死动脉介入治疗的患病率、预测因素及院内结局(来自国家心血管数据注册库)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 15;104(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
10
Culprit only or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的罪犯血管或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Aug;8(4):456-64. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I4A72.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete Revascularization in NSTE-ACS and Multivessel Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Implications.非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征合并多支血管病变的完全血运重建:临床结局及预后意义
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;15(8):1299. doi: 10.3390/life15081299.
2
Effect of Complete Revascularization in STEMI: Ischemia-Driven Rehospitalization and Cardiovascular Mortality.ST段抬高型心肌梗死完全血运重建的效果:缺血驱动的再住院率和心血管死亡率。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4793. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134793.
3
Virtual physiological analysis of non-culprit disease in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease: a substudy of the COMPLETE trial.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者非罪犯病变的虚拟生理分析:COMPLETE试验的一项子研究
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Jun 11;5(3):oeaf057. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf057. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Comparison of complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中完全血运重建与仅对罪犯病变进行血运重建的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04777-7.
5
Fractional flow reserve-guided complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis.在多支血管病变的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,血流储备分数引导下的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 11;12:1509912. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1509912. eCollection 2025.
6
Efficacy and safety of different revascularization strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同血运重建策略在多支血管病变的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Dec;20(4):382-392. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.144666. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
7
Optional Revascularization Strategies for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的选择性血运重建策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 4;25(6):209. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506209. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Nomogram to Predict Outcomes After Staged Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病分期血运重建术后结局的列线图
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Apr 29;17:1713-1722. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S457236. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparison of angiographic estimation and invasive hemodynamic measurement of the significance of non-infarct-related residual stenoses in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者非梗死相关残余狭窄严重程度的血管造影评估与有创血流动力学测量的比较
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2023 Dec 30;8:e169-e176. doi: 10.5114/amsad/172971. eCollection 2023.
10
Thirty-day outcomes of in-hospital multi-vessel versus culprit-only revascularization strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary disease.多支冠状动脉病变的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间多支血管与仅罪犯血管血运重建策略的30天结局
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Jul 28;20(7):485-494. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.07.005.