University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1373-82. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
This double-blind study evaluated change in cognitive performance and functional capacity in lurasidone and quetiapine XR-treated schizophrenia patients over a 6-week, placebo-controlled study, followed by a 6-month, double-blind extension. Cognitive performance and functional capacity were assessed with the CogState computerized cognitive battery and the UPSA-B. Analyses were conducted for all subjects, as well as the subsample whose test scores met prespecified validity criteria. No statistically significant differences were found for change in the composite neurocognitive score for lurasidone (80 mg/day and 160 mg/day) groups, quetiapine XR and placebo in the full sample at week 6. For the evaluable sample (N = 267), lurasidone 160 mg was superior to both placebo and quetiapine on the neurocognitive composite, while lurasidone 80 mg, quetiapine XR, and placebo did not differ. UPSA-B scores were superior to placebo at 6 weeks for all treatments. In the double-blind extension study, analysis of the full sample showed significantly better cognitive performance in the lurasidone (40-160 mg) group compared to the quetiapine XR (200-800 mg) group at both 3 and 6 months. Cognitive and UPSA-B total scores were significantly correlated at baseline and for change over time. This is the first study to date where the investigational treatment was superior to placebo on both cognitive assessments and a functional coprimary measure at 6 weeks, as well as demonstrated superiority to an active comparator on cognitive assessments at 6 weeks and at 6 months of extension study treatment. These findings require replication, but are not due to practice effects, because of the placebo and active controls.
这项双盲研究评估了在 6 周安慰剂对照研究后,使用鲁拉西酮和喹硫平 XR 治疗的精神分裂症患者认知表现和功能能力的变化,随后进行了 6 个月的双盲扩展。使用 CogState 计算机认知电池和 UPSA-B 评估认知表现和功能能力。对所有受试者以及符合预定有效性标准的测试分数的亚样本进行了分析。在第 6 周时,未发现鲁拉西酮(80mg/天和 160mg/天)组、喹硫平 XR 和安慰剂组的复合神经认知评分变化有统计学意义。对于可评估样本(N=267),鲁拉西酮 160mg 优于安慰剂和喹硫平 XR 在神经认知综合评分上,而鲁拉西酮 80mg、喹硫平 XR 和安慰剂之间无差异。在 6 周时,所有治疗组的 UPSA-B 评分均优于安慰剂。在双盲扩展研究中,对全样本的分析显示,与喹硫平 XR(200-800mg)组相比,鲁拉西酮(40-160mg)组在 3 个月和 6 个月时的认知表现均显著更好。认知和 UPSA-B 总分在基线和随时间变化时均呈显著相关。这是第一项研究,在 6 周时,研究治疗在认知评估和功能主要次要终点上均优于安慰剂,并且在 6 周和 6 个月的扩展研究治疗时,在认知评估上优于活性对照。这些发现需要复制,但不是由于练习效应,因为有安慰剂和活性对照。