University of Western Sydney, Australia.
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
Physical education (PE) programs aim to promote physical activity (PA) and reach most school-aged youth. However, PA levels within PE lessons are often low. In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, we examined the effects of three self-determination theory-based motivational strategies on PA and sedentary behavior, as well as their hypothesized antecedents during PE lessons.
Data were collected in Sydney, Australia (October-December 2011). After baseline testing, teachers (n=16) and their classes (n=288 students; M=13.6 years, 50.4% male) were randomly assigned to one of four teaching strategy conditions: (1) explaining relevance; (2) providing choice; (3) complete free choice; or (4) usual practice. Teachers then delivered the assigned strategy. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-assessed PA and student motivation during lessons. Secondary outcomes included sedentary behavior, perceptions of teachers' support and psychological needs satisfaction.
The 'free choice' intervention increased PA (p<.05). 'Providing choice' and 'free choice' interventions decreased sedentary behavior (p<.05). The interventions did not influence motivation, but students' autonomy increased during both choice-based interventions (p<.05).
Promoting choice can produce short-term increases in PA and decreases in sedentary behavior, as well as increased perceived autonomy during PE lessons.
体育教育(PE)计划旨在促进体育活动(PA)并覆盖大多数学龄青年。然而,PE 课程中的 PA 水平往往较低。在这项基于自我决定理论的集群随机对照试验中,我们研究了三种动机策略对 PA 和久坐行为的影响,以及它们在 PE 课程中假设的前因。
数据采集于澳大利亚悉尼(2011 年 10 月至 12 月)。基线测试后,教师(n=16)及其班级(n=288 名学生;M=13.6 岁,50.4%为男性)被随机分配到以下四种教学策略条件之一:(1)解释相关性;(2)提供选择;(3)完全自由选择;或(4)常规实践。然后,教师实施指定的策略。主要结果是通过加速度计评估的 PA 和学生在课程中的动机。次要结果包括久坐行为、教师支持和心理需求满足感的感知。
“自由选择”干预增加了 PA(p<.05)。“提供选择”和“自由选择”干预减少了久坐行为(p<.05)。这些干预措施并没有影响动机,但在两个基于选择的干预措施中,学生的自主性都有所提高(p<.05)。
促进选择可以在 PE 课程中产生短期的 PA 增加和久坐行为减少,以及自主性增加。