Esmaeilzadeh Samad, Rodriquez-Negro Josune, Pesola Arto J
Active Life Lab, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli, Finland.
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:888758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888758. eCollection 2022.
Both reducing sitting and increasing physical exercise promote health but exercising more does not necessarily reduce sitting time. One reason for this non-dependency may be that different aspects of exercise motivation are differently related to sitting time. Identifying the type of exercise motivation that would also be associated with sitting time can help to reduce sitting indirectly through increased exercise, thus bringing greater benefits.
The present study explored the association between quality of motivations toward physical activity with physical activity and sitting time in a total of 373 adults (age range = 23-81; women = 256). The short version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was used for measuring physical activity and sitting time. Reasons for exercising regularly were measured with the Self-Regulated Questionnaire-Exercise (SRQ-E), including four regulation subscales to assess regulation styles (i.e., intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation and external regulation). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the four subscales of SRQ-E (latent variables) with the data obtained using AMOS v.23 (Analysis of Moment Structures). Then, structural equation model (SEM) with maximum likelihood estimates was used to test the hypothesized model.
The results indicated that only intrinsic motivation, but not identified, introjected or external motivation, toward physical activity predicted both physical activity and sitting time. Higher intrinsic motivation toward physical activity was associated with both higher physical activity and lower sitting time. In addition, physical activity was a mediator for lower sitting time when the source was intrinsic motivation.
Previous studies have shown low between and within participant correlation between sitting time and physical activity, and interventions have generally failed to both increase physical activity while decreasing sitting time. The present cross-sectional results suggest that targeting increased physical activity by increased intrinsic motivation has the potential to both increase physical activity and decrease sitting time.
减少久坐时间和增加体育锻炼均有益健康,但增加运动量并不一定会减少久坐时间。这种不相关性的一个原因可能是运动动机的不同方面与久坐时间的关联方式不同。确定与久坐时间相关的运动动机类型有助于通过增加运动量间接减少久坐时间,从而带来更大益处。
本研究探讨了373名成年人(年龄范围 = 23 - 81岁;女性 = 256名)的身体活动动机质量与身体活动及久坐时间之间的关联。使用国际身体活动问卷简版(IPAQ)来测量身体活动和久坐时间。通过自我调节运动问卷(SRQ - E)测量定期锻炼的原因,该问卷包括四个调节子量表以评估调节方式(即内在动机、认同调节、内摄调节和外部调节)。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对SRQ - E的四个子量表(潜在变量)与使用AMOS v.23(矩结构分析)获得的数据进行检验。然后,使用具有最大似然估计的结构方程模型(SEM)来检验假设模型。
结果表明,只有身体活动的内在动机,而非认同、内摄或外部动机,能预测身体活动和久坐时间。更高的身体活动内在动机与更高的身体活动水平和更低的久坐时间相关。此外,当来源是内在动机时,身体活动是久坐时间减少的中介因素。
先前的研究表明,久坐时间与身体活动之间的参与者间和参与者内相关性较低,并且干预措施通常未能在增加身体活动的同时减少久坐时间。本横断面研究结果表明,通过增加内在动机来增加身体活动量有可能同时增加身体活动并减少久坐时间。