Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Int Health. 2009 Sep;1(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.02.001.
The year 2008 marked the 30 year anniversary of Primary Health Care, the health policy of all member nations of the WHO. Community participation was one of the key principles of this policy. This article reviews the experiences of and lessons learned by policy makers, planners and programme managers in attempting to integrate community participation into their health programmes. The lessons, identified in an earlier article by the author, are still relevant today. They help to identify three reasons why integrating community participation into health programmes is so difficult. These reasons are: (1) the dominance of the bio-medical paradigm as the main planning tool for programmes, leading to the view of community participation as an intervention; (2) the lack of in-depth analysis of the perceptions of community members regarding the use of community health workers; and (3) the propensity to use a framework that limits investigation into what works, why and how in community participation in health programmes. Despite these challenges, evidence suggests that community participation has contributed to health improvements at the local level, particularly in poor communities, and will continue to be relevant to programme professionals.
2008 年标志着初级卫生保健(世界卫生组织所有成员国的卫生政策)的 30 周年。社区参与是该政策的关键原则之一。本文回顾了政策制定者、规划者和方案管理者在尝试将社区参与纳入其卫生方案方面的经验和教训。作者在之前的一篇文章中确定了这些经验教训,这些经验教训在今天仍然具有现实意义。它们有助于确定将社区参与纳入卫生方案如此困难的三个原因。这些原因是:(1)生物医学范式作为方案规划工具的主导地位,导致将社区参与视为一种干预措施;(2)对社区成员对使用社区卫生工作者的看法缺乏深入分析;(3)倾向于使用一个框架,限制了对社区参与卫生方案中什么有效、为什么有效以及如何有效的调查。尽管存在这些挑战,但有证据表明,社区参与已为地方一级的健康改善做出了贡献,特别是在贫困社区,并且将继续与方案专业人员相关。