Rifkin Susan B
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(Suppl 3):e001188. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001188. eCollection 2018.
Forty years ago, the 134 national government members of the WHO signed the Alma Ata Declaration. The Declaration made Primary Health Care (PHC) the official health policy of all members countries. Emerging from the conference was the consensus that health was a human right based on the principles of equity and community participation. Alma Ata broadened the perception of health beyond doctors and hospitals to social determinants and social justice. In the following years implementing this policy confronted many challenges. These included: (1) whether PHC should focus on vertical disease programmes where interventions had the most possibility of success or on comprehensive programmes that addressed social, economic and political factors that influenced health improvements; (2) whether primary care and PHC are interchangeable approaches to health improvements; (3) how equity and community participation for health improvements would be institutionalised; and (4) how financing for PHC would be possible. Experiences in implementation over the last 40 years provide evidence of how these challenges have been met and what succeeded and what had failed. Lessons from these experiences include the need to understand PHC as a process rather than a blueprint, to understand the process must consider context, culture, politics, economics and social concerns, and therefore, to recognise the process is complex. PHC needs to be examined within evaluation frameworks that address complexity. Recent developments in monitoring and evaluation have begun to respond to this need. They include realist evaluation and implementation research.
四十年前,世界卫生组织的134个成员国政府代表签署了《阿拉木图宣言》。该宣言将初级卫生保健确立为所有成员国的官方卫生政策。会议达成的共识是,健康是一项基于公平和社区参与原则的人权。阿拉木图将健康的概念从医生和医院扩展到社会决定因素和社会正义。在接下来的几年里,实施这项政策面临诸多挑战。这些挑战包括:(1)初级卫生保健应侧重于干预措施最有可能成功的垂直疾病项目,还是侧重于解决影响健康改善的社会、经济和政治因素的综合项目;(2)初级保健和初级卫生保健是否是改善健康的可互换方法;(3)如何将促进健康的公平性和社区参与制度化;(4)如何为初级卫生保健提供资金。过去40年的实施经验证明了这些挑战是如何得到应对的,哪些成功了,哪些失败了。这些经验教训包括,需要将初级卫生保健理解为一个过程而非蓝图,理解这个过程必须考虑背景、文化、政治、经济和社会问题,因此,要认识到这个过程是复杂的。初级卫生保健需要在应对复杂性的评估框架内进行审视。监测和评估方面的最新进展已开始回应这一需求。它们包括现实主义评估和实施研究。