Department of Psychology, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT, 84720, USA,
Environ Manage. 2013 Nov;52(5):1271-85. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0164-z. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
Transportation infrastructure in national parks has historically been designed for the automobile. With more vehicles in the parks, visitors found themselves in circumstances more reminiscent of a city than a park. Traffic jams, overcrowding, illegal parking, horn honking, and idling vehicles became common, creating stress and contributing to air and noise pollution, the very things visitors were hoping to get away from. Park managers began searching for alternatives, including shuttle systems. Many national parks have implemented optional shuttle systems, but relatively few have completely closed roads to vehicles, transporting visitors on mandatory shuttles. Zion National Park instituted a mandatory shuttle system in May 2000 to relieve crowding and congestion in the main canyon and to protect natural resources. Taking a longitudinal approach, attributes of the shuttle (e.g., crowding, accessibility, freedom, efficiency, preference, and success) were assessed with experiential park factors (e.g., scenic beauty, naturalness, solitude, tranquility, air quality, and soundscape) in 2000, 2003, and 2010 by surveying shuttle-riding park visitors. While visitors initially reported a few reservations about the shuttle system, by 2003, the majority rated the system successful. Ratings of all shuttle-related variables, except crowding, improved over the decade. Improvements were greatest for freedom, accessibility, and efficiency. Multiple regression found overall shuttle success to be mediated by preference, freedom, accessibility, efficiency, and comfort. Experiential variables assessing park conditions followed a similar pattern, with improved ratings as the decade progressed. Results provide important insights into the visitor experience with mandatory alternative shuttle systems in national parks.
国家公园的交通基础设施在历史上是为汽车设计的。随着公园内车辆的增加,游客发现自己所处的环境更像是城市而不是公园。交通堵塞、过度拥挤、非法停车、鸣笛和怠速车辆变得很常见,造成了压力,并导致了空气和噪音污染,而这些正是游客希望远离的。公园管理者开始寻找替代方案,包括班车系统。许多国家公园已经实施了可选的班车系统,但相对较少的公园完全关闭了道路,让游客乘坐强制性的班车。锡安国家公园于 2000 年 5 月实施了强制性班车系统,以缓解主要峡谷的拥挤和拥堵,并保护自然资源。采用纵向方法,通过调查班车游客,在 2000 年、2003 年和 2010 年,用体验性公园因素(如风景秀丽、自然、宁静、宁静、空气质量和声景)评估了班车的属性(如拥挤、可及性、自由、效率、偏好和成功)。虽然游客最初对班车系统有一些保留意见,但到 2003 年,大多数人认为该系统是成功的。除了拥挤之外,所有与班车相关的变量的评分在这十年中都有所提高。自由、可及性和效率的改善最大。多元回归发现,总体上班车的成功是由偏好、自由、可及性、效率和舒适度来调节的。评估公园条件的体验性变量也呈现出类似的模式,随着十年的推进,评分有所提高。结果为国家公园强制性替代班车系统的游客体验提供了重要的见解。