Hieu Pham Duong, Baek Dong Heon, Park Dong Soo, Park Jong-Tae, Hong Ki Seok
From the *Department of Periodontology, †Perio-Implant Research Center, and ‡Department of Oral Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan; §US Army Carius Dental Clinic, Dentac-Korea; and ∥Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Sep;24(5):1552-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318290264b.
The aim of the present study was to determine the bone response to magnesium (Mg) ion-incorporated titanium (Ti) implants during the early healing period. A total of 114 patients (69 men and 45 women aged between 29 and 71 years) participated in the study. Overall, one hundred thirty-three 10-mm-long fixtures were installed, composed of 65 Mg ion-incorporated fixtures in the test group (55 participants; 30 males and 25 females) and 68 resorbable blast media (RBM) surface fixtures in the control group (59 participants; 39 males and 20 females). The bone responses were evaluated by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the following time points after implant insertion (ie, the healing period): 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Each time an RFA measurement was taken, the stability changes relating to both bone quality and implant arch location (maxilla or mandible) were recorded for further analysis. The mean stabilities were lowest at week 4 of healing for both the test and control groups. Significant differences in RFA values between the 2 groups were found at week 12 of healing. The mean percentage change in implant stability quotient (ISQ) from the baseline revealed that the implant stability of the Mg ion-incorporated test group had increased (4.55%) more than the RBM surface group (2.23%) by week 12 of healing. With respect to bone quality, the mean ISQ of Mg-incorporated Ti implants only changed significantly during the 12-week period for type 4 bone. Furthermore, at weeks 4 and 12 of healing, significant differences were found between the 2 groups for type 2 and type 4 bone. A comparison of the stability patterns of mandibular and maxillary implants revealed that the overall stability was higher in the mandible; however, no significant difference was found for Mg-incorporated Ti implants. The Mg-incorporated Ti implants exhibited a slightly better bone response with respect to ISQ than did the RBM surface implants, and the percentage change in mean ISQ from the baseline was greater for the Mg-incorporated group than for the RBM surface group at the end point of this study.
本研究的目的是确定在早期愈合阶段镁(Mg)离子掺杂钛(Ti)种植体的骨反应。共有114名患者(69名男性和45名女性,年龄在29至71岁之间)参与了该研究。总体而言,共植入了133颗10毫米长的种植体,其中试验组有65颗镁离子掺杂种植体(55名参与者;30名男性和25名女性),对照组有68颗可吸收喷砂介质(RBM)表面处理种植体(59名参与者;39名男性和20名女性)。在种植体植入后的以下时间点(即愈合期)通过共振频率分析(RFA)评估骨反应:0、2、4、8和12周。每次进行RFA测量时,记录与骨质量和种植体牙弓位置(上颌或下颌)相关的稳定性变化,以供进一步分析。试验组和对照组在愈合第4周时平均稳定性最低。在愈合第12周时发现两组之间的RFA值存在显著差异。从基线开始,种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的平均百分比变化表明,到愈合第12周时,镁离子掺杂试验组的种植体稳定性增加(4.55%)比RBM表面处理组(2.23%)更多。就骨质量而言,镁掺杂钛种植体的平均ISQ仅在第4类骨的12周期间有显著变化。此外,在愈合第4周和第12周时,发现两组在第2类和第4类骨方面存在显著差异。下颌和上颌种植体稳定性模式的比较表明,下颌的总体稳定性更高;然而,镁掺杂钛种植体未发现显著差异。与RBM表面种植体相比,镁掺杂钛种植体在ISQ方面表现出稍好的骨反应,并且在本研究终点时,镁掺杂组的平均ISQ相对于基线的百分比变化大于RBM表面组。