Suppr超能文献

愈合期间延迟加载和即刻加载种植体的种植体稳定性测量

Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.

作者信息

Bischof Mark, Nedir Rabah, Szmukler-Moncler Serge, Bernard Jean-Pierre, Samson Jacky

机构信息

CdC Clinique Dentaire de Chauderon, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):529-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was (1) to measure the primary stability of ITI implants placed in both jaws and determine the factors that affect the implant stability quotient (ISQ) determined by the resonance frequency method and (2) to monitor implant stability during the first 3 months of healing and evaluate any difference between immediately loaded (IL) implants and standard delayed loaded (DL) implants. The IL and DL groups consisted of 18 patients/63 implants and 18 patients/43 implants. IL implants were loaded after 2 days; DL implants were left to heal according to the one-stage procedure. The ISQ was recorded with an Osstell apparatus (Integration Diagnostics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) at implant placement, after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. Primary stability was affected by the jaw and the bone type. The ISQ was higher in the mandible (59.8+/-6.7) than the maxilla (55.0+/-6.8). The ISQ was significantly higher in type I bone (62.8+/-7.2) than in type III bone (56.0+/-7.8). The implant position, implant length, implant diameter and implant deepening (esthetic plus implants) did not affect primary stability. After 3 months, the gain in stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla. The influence of bone type was leveled off and bone quality did not affect implant stability. The resonance-frequency analysis method did not reveal any difference in implant stability between the IL and DL implants over the healing period. Implant stability remained constant or increased slightly during the first 4-6 weeks and then increased more markedly. One DL and IL implant failed; both were 8 mm long placed in type III bone. At the 1-year control, the survival rate of the IL and the DL implants was 98.4% and 97.7%, respectively. This study showed no difference in implant stability between the IL and DL procedures over the first 3 months. IL short-span bridges placed in the posterior region and full arch rehabilitation of the maxilla with ITI sandblasted-and-etched implants were highly predictable.

摘要

本研究的目的是

(1)测量植入上下颌的ITI种植体的初期稳定性,并确定影响通过共振频率法测定的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的因素;(2)监测愈合前3个月内种植体的稳定性,并评估即刻负载(IL)种植体与标准延期负载(DL)种植体之间的差异。IL组和DL组分别由18例患者/63颗种植体和18例患者/43颗种植体组成。IL种植体在2天后进行负载;DL种植体按照一期手术程序进行愈合。在种植体植入时、1、2、4、6、8、10和12周后,使用Osstell仪器(瑞典哥德堡的Integration Diagnostics AB公司)记录ISQ。初期稳定性受颌骨和骨类型的影响。下颌骨的ISQ(59.8±6.7)高于上颌骨(55.0±6.8)。I型骨的ISQ(62.8±7.2)显著高于III型骨(-56.0±7.8)。种植体位置、种植体长、种植体直径和种植体加深(美学加种植体)不影响初期稳定性。3个月后,下颌骨的稳定性增益高于上颌骨。骨类型的影响趋于平稳,骨质不影响种植体稳定性。共振频率分析方法未显示在愈合期IL种植体和DL种植体之间的种植体稳定性有任何差异。在最初的4-6周内,种植体稳定性保持恒定或略有增加,然后增加更为明显。1颗DL种植体和1颗IL种植体失败;两者均为8mm长,植入III型骨。在1年的随访中,IL种植体和DL种植体的存留率分别为98.4%和97.7%。本研究表明,在最初3个月内,IL和DL程序在种植体稳定性方面没有差异。放置在后牙区的IL短跨度桥以及使用ITI喷砂酸蚀种植体对上颌进行全牙弓修复具有高度可预测性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验