• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价来自不同种族人群全基因组关联研究的与前列腺癌风险相关的 SNP 在华人群体中的应用。

Evaluation of reported prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs from genome-wide association studies of various racial populations in Chinese men.

机构信息

Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR, China.

出版信息

Prostate. 2013 Nov;73(15):1623-35. doi: 10.1002/pros.22629. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1002/pros.22629
PMID:24038036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3928594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of prostate cancer (PCa) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are significantly associated with PCa risk in various racial groups. The objective of this study is to evaluate which of these SNPs are associated with PCa risk in Chinese men and estimate their strength of association.

METHODS

All SNPs that were reported to be associated with PCa risk in GWAS from populations of European, African American, Japanese, and Chinese descent were evaluated in 1,922 PCa cases and 2,175 controls selected from the Chinese Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ChinaPCa). A logistic regression analysis was used to estimate allelic odds ratios (ORs) of these SNPs for PCa.

RESULTS

Among the 53 SNPs, 50 were polymorphic in the Chinese population. Of which, 10 and 24 SNPs were significantly associated with PCa risk in Chinese men at P < 0.001 and <0.05, respectively. These 24 significant SNPs included 17, 5, and 2 SNPs that were originally discovered in European, Japanese, and Chinese descent, respectively. The estimated ORs ranged from 1.10 to 1.49 and the direction of association was consistent with previous studies. When ORs were estimated separately for PCa with Gleason score ≤7 and ≥8, a marginally significant difference in ORs was found only for two of the 24 SNPs (P = 0.02 and 0.04).

CONCLUSION

About half of PCa risk-associated SNPs identified in GWAS of various populations are associated with PCa risk in Chinese men. Information on PCa risk-associated SNPs and their ORs may facilitate risk assessment of PCa risk in Chinese men.

摘要

背景

几项前列腺癌(PCa)的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了许多单核苷酸多态性(SNPs),这些 SNPs 与不同种族群体的 PCa 风险显著相关。本研究的目的是评估这些 SNPs 中哪些与中国男性的 PCa 风险相关,并估计它们的关联强度。

方法

评估了来自欧洲、非裔美国人、日本和中国血统的 GWAS 中报道与 PCa 风险相关的所有 SNPs,这些 SNPs 在中国前列腺癌遗传联合体(ChinaPCa)中选择的 1922 例 PCa 病例和 2175 例对照中进行了评估。使用逻辑回归分析来估计这些 SNPs 对 PCa 的等位基因优势比(OR)。

结果

在 53 个 SNP 中,有 50 个在中国人中具有多态性。其中,有 10 个和 24 个 SNP 在中国男性中与 PCa 风险显著相关,P 值均小于 0.001 和 <0.05。这 24 个显著 SNP 包括 17 个、5 个和 2 个最初在欧洲、日本和中国血统中发现的 SNP。估计的 OR 范围为 1.10 至 1.49,其关联方向与之前的研究一致。当分别为 Gleason 评分≤7 和≥8 的 PCa 估计 OR 时,仅在 24 个 SNP 中的两个中发现 OR 存在略微显著差异(P=0.02 和 0.04)。

结论

在不同人群的 GWAS 中确定的与 PCa 风险相关的 SNP 中,约有一半与中国男性的 PCa 风险相关。与 PCa 风险相关的 SNP 及其 OR 的信息可能有助于评估中国男性的 PCa 风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of reported prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs from genome-wide association studies of various racial populations in Chinese men.评价来自不同种族人群全基因组关联研究的与前列腺癌风险相关的 SNP 在华人群体中的应用。
Prostate. 2013 Nov;73(15):1623-35. doi: 10.1002/pros.22629. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
2
Predictive performance of prostate cancer risk in Chinese men using 33 reported prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs.基于 33 个已报道的前列腺癌风险相关 SNP 预测中国男性前列腺癌风险的预测性能。
Prostate. 2012 Apr;72(5):577-83. doi: 10.1002/pros.21462. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
3
Association of six susceptibility Loci with prostate cancer in northern chinese men.六个易感基因座与中国北方男性前列腺癌的关联。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(12):6273-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.12.6273.
4
Systematic confirmation study of reported prostate cancer risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms in Chinese men.中国男性前列腺癌风险相关单核苷酸多态性的系统验证研究。
Cancer Sci. 2011 Oct;102(10):1916-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02036.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
5
A genetic study and meta-analysis of the genetic predisposition of prostate cancer in a Chinese population.一项针对中国人群前列腺癌遗传易感性的基因研究与荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 19;7(16):21393-403. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7250.
6
Replication of prostate cancer risk loci in a Japanese case-control association study.日本病例对照关联研究中前列腺癌风险位点的复制
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1330-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp287. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
7
Prediction of prostate cancer from prostate biopsy in Chinese men using a genetic score derived from 24 prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs.利用来自 24 个前列腺癌风险相关 SNP 的遗传评分预测中国男性前列腺癌活检。
Prostate. 2013 Nov;73(15):1651-9. doi: 10.1002/pros.22661. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
8
Two novel PRKCI polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in an Eastern Chinese Han population.中国东部汉族人群中两个新的PRKCI基因多态性与前列腺癌风险
Mol Carcinog. 2015 Aug;54(8):632-41. doi: 10.1002/mc.22130. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
The Cumulative Effect of Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions on the Risk of Prostate Cancer in Chinese Men.基因-基因和基因-环境相互作用对中国男性前列腺癌风险的累积效应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 27;13(2):162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020162.
10
Validation of prostate cancer risk-related loci identified from genome-wide association studies using family-based association analysis: evidence from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG).利用基于家系的关联分析验证全基因组关联研究中确定的前列腺癌风险相关基因座:来自前列腺癌遗传国际联合会(ICPCG)的证据。
Hum Genet. 2012 Jul;131(7):1095-103. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1136-0. Epub 2011 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic associations of prostate cancer in China: a systematic review.中国前列腺癌的遗传关联:一项系统综述。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13830-9.
2
Genome-Wide 3'-UTR Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Association Study Identifies Significant Prostate Cancer Risk-Associated Functional Loci at 8p21.2 in Chinese Population.全基因组 3'-UTR 单核苷酸多态性关联研究鉴定了中国人群中 8p21.2 上与前列腺癌风险显著相关的功能性位点。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022 Aug;9(23):e2201420. doi: 10.1002/advs.202201420. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
Different Trends in the Incidence and Mortality Rates of Prostate Cancer Between China and the USA: A Joinpoint and Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Reproducibility, performance, and clinical utility of a genetic risk prediction model for prostate cancer in Japanese.日本人群前列腺癌遗传风险预测模型的可重复性、性能和临床实用性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046454. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
2
A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to identify prostate cancer susceptibility loci associated with aggressive and non-aggressive disease.一项全基因组关联研究的荟萃分析,旨在鉴定与侵袭性和非侵袭性前列腺癌相关的易感性基因座。
Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Jan 15;22(2):408-15. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds425. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
3
Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4.
中国与美国前列腺癌发病率和死亡率的不同趋势:连接点和年龄-时期-队列分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;9:824464. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.824464. eCollection 2022.
4
Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Characteristics and Cancer-Specific Mortality: An Overview.前列腺癌特征及癌症特异性死亡率的种族差异:概述
World J Mens Health. 2022 Apr;40(2):217-227. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210070. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
5
Genetic Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment.与前列腺癌从主动监测转为治疗相关的遗传因素。
HGG Adv. 2022 Jan 13;3(1). doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100070. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
6
The incidence, mortality, and risk factors of prostate cancer in Asian men.亚洲男性前列腺癌的发病率、死亡率及风险因素。
Prostate Int. 2019 Mar;7(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Prostate Cancer Genomics: Recent Advances and the Prevailing Underrepresentation from Racial and Ethnic Minorities.前列腺癌基因组学:最新进展与少数族裔代表性不足的现状。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 22;19(4):1255. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041255.
8
Validation of the novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in a Chinese population.中国人群中前列腺癌新易感基因座的验证
Oncol Lett. 2018 Feb;15(2):2567-2573. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7602. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
PSCA rs1045531 Polymorphism and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Chinese Population Undergoing Prostate Biopsy.PSCA基因rs1045531多态性与接受前列腺穿刺活检的中国人群患前列腺癌风险的关系
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;16(6):1168-1172. doi: 10.1177/1533034617740264. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Genetic ancestry and prostate cancer susceptibility SNPs in Puerto Rican and African American men.波多黎各裔和非裔美国男性的遗传血统与前列腺癌易感性单核苷酸多态性
Prostate. 2017 Jul;77(10):1118-1127. doi: 10.1002/pros.23368. Epub 2017 May 24.
全基因组关联研究在中国男性中鉴定出两个新的前列腺癌风险位点,位于 9q31.2 和 19q13.4。
Nat Genet. 2012 Nov;44(11):1231-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2424. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
4
A novel germline mutation in HOXB13 is associated with prostate cancer risk in Chinese men.HOXB13 中的一个新种系突变与中国男性的前列腺癌风险相关。
Prostate. 2013 Jan;73(2):169-75. doi: 10.1002/pros.22552. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Potential impact of adding genetic markers to clinical parameters in predicting prostate biopsy outcomes in men following an initial negative biopsy: findings from the REDUCE trial.在初始阴性前列腺活检后,添加遗传标记物对临床参数在预测前列腺活检结果中的潜在影响:来自 REDUCE 试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):953-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 12.
6
Common variants at 11q12, 10q26 and 3p11.2 are associated with prostate cancer susceptibility in Japanese.常见的 11q12、10q26 和 3p11.2 变异与日本人的前列腺癌易感性相关。
Nat Genet. 2012 Feb 26;44(4):426-9, S1. doi: 10.1038/ng.1104.
7
Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk.HOXB13 种系突变与前列腺癌风险。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):141-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110000.
8
Replication and cumulative effects of GWAS-identified genetic variations for prostate cancer in Asians: a case-control study in the ChinaPCa consortium.GWAS 鉴定的亚洲前列腺癌遗传变异的复制和累积效应:中国前列腺癌联盟的病例对照研究。
Carcinogenesis. 2012 Feb;33(2):356-60. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr279. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
9
Systematic confirmation study of reported prostate cancer risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms in Chinese men.中国男性前列腺癌风险相关单核苷酸多态性的系统验证研究。
Cancer Sci. 2011 Oct;102(10):1916-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02036.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
10
Seven prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified by a multi-stage genome-wide association study.七个前列腺癌易感性位点通过多阶段全基因组关联研究确定。
Nat Genet. 2011 Jul 10;43(8):785-91. doi: 10.1038/ng.882.