Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔地区象皮病患者的耻辱感及其应对策略的定性研究。

A qualitative study on stigma and coping strategies of patients with podoconiosis in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia.

机构信息

College of Social Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Int Health. 2011 Sep;3(3):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.06.006.

Abstract

Podoconiosis (endemic non-filarial elephantiasis) is a neglected tropical disease that causes affected individuals intense social stigma. Although some studies have investigated community-based stigma against podoconiosis, none has yet attempted to assess coping strategies used by patients to counter stigma. This study aimed to describe and categorize the coping strategies employed by podoconiosis patients against stigma. From January-March 2010 data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 44 patients, six focus group discussions (with a total of 42 participants) and two key informant interviews. The coping strategies employed by patients to deal with stigma could be categorized into three areas: active, avoidant and through changing the relational meaning. Of these coping strategies, avoidant coping is the most negative since it encourages isolation and pushes those employing it towards more risky decisions. Many podoconiosis patients are forced to use this strategy through lack of control due to extreme poverty. Intervention programs must therefore create circumstances in which patients are empowered to actively cope with stigma and play a role in stigma reduction.

摘要

疣状非血丝丝虫性象皮病(简称 Podoconiosis)是一种被忽视的热带病,会给患者带来严重的社会耻辱感。尽管已有一些研究调查了针对 Podoconiosis 的社区污名化问题,但尚无研究尝试评估患者用来应对污名的应对策略。本研究旨在描述和分类 Podoconiosis 患者用来应对污名的应对策略。2010 年 1 月至 3 月,通过对 44 名患者进行深入访谈、六次焦点小组讨论(共有 42 名参与者)和两次关键知情人访谈收集了数据。患者用来应对污名的应对策略可分为三个领域:积极、回避和改变关系意义。在这些应对策略中,回避应对策略最消极,因为它鼓励孤立,并促使那些采用这种策略的人做出更冒险的决定。由于极度贫困,许多 Podoconiosis 患者被迫采用这种策略。因此,干预计划必须创造条件,使患者能够积极应对污名,并在减少污名方面发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验