Suppr超能文献

DNA 提取方法和采样技术对牛和羊瘤胃微生物群落表观结构的影响。

Effect of DNA extraction methods and sampling techniques on the apparent structure of cow and sheep rumen microbial communities.

机构信息

AgResearch Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e74787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074787. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Molecular microbial ecology techniques are widely used to study the composition of the rumen microbiota and to increase understanding of the roles they play. Therefore, sampling and DNA extraction methods that result in adequate yields of microbial DNA that also accurately represents the microbial community are crucial. Fifteen different methods were used to extract DNA from cow and sheep rumen samples. The DNA yield and quality, and its suitability for downstream PCR amplifications varied considerably, depending on the DNA extraction method used. DNA extracts from nine extraction methods that passed these first quality criteria were evaluated further by quantitative PCR enumeration of microbial marker loci. Absolute microbial numbers, determined on the same rumen samples, differed by more than 100-fold, depending on the DNA extraction method used. The apparent compositions of the archaeal, bacterial, ciliate protozoal, and fungal communities in identical rumen samples were assessed using 454 Titanium pyrosequencing. Significant differences in microbial community composition were observed between extraction methods, for example in the relative abundances of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Microbial communities in parallel samples collected from cows by oral stomach-tubing or through a rumen fistula, and in liquid and solid rumen digesta fractions, were compared using one of the DNA extraction methods. Community representations were generally similar, regardless of the rumen sampling technique used, but significant differences in the abundances of some microbial taxa such as the Clostridiales and the Methanobrevibacter ruminantium clade were observed. The apparent microbial community composition differed between rumen sample fractions, and Prevotellaceae were most abundant in the liquid fraction. DNA extraction methods that involved phenol-chloroform extraction and mechanical lysis steps tended to be more comparable. However, comparison of data from studies in which different sampling techniques, different rumen sample fractions or different DNA extraction methods were used should be avoided.

摘要

分子微生物生态学技术广泛用于研究瘤胃微生物群落的组成,并增进对其功能的理解。因此,采用能够获得足够数量微生物 DNA 且准确代表微生物群落的采样和 DNA 提取方法至关重要。本研究采用 15 种不同方法从奶牛和绵羊瘤胃液样品中提取 DNA。结果表明,不同 DNA 提取方法得到的 DNA 产量和质量以及适用于下游 PCR 扩增的程度差异很大。通过对通过上述质量标准的 9 种提取方法的 DNA 提取物进行进一步的微生物标记基因定量 PCR 计数评估发现,基于相同瘤胃液样品,不同提取方法得到的绝对微生物数量差异超过 100 倍。使用 454 Titanium 焦磷酸测序评估相同瘤胃液样品中古菌、细菌、纤毛虫原生动物和真菌群落的表观组成。结果发现,不同提取方法的微生物群落组成存在显著差异,例如在厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门成员的相对丰度上。通过口胃管或瘤胃瘘管从奶牛采集的平行样品以及液体和固体瘤胃液部分,使用其中一种 DNA 提取方法进行比较。无论使用何种瘤胃液采样技术,群落的代表通常相似,但某些微生物类群(如拟杆菌门和甲烷短杆菌属分支)的丰度存在显著差异。瘤胃液样品部分之间的表观微生物群落组成存在差异,普雷沃氏菌科在液体部分最为丰富。涉及酚-氯仿提取和机械裂解步骤的 DNA 提取方法往往更具可比性。然而,应避免比较使用不同采样技术、不同瘤胃液样品部分或不同 DNA 提取方法的研究数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e884/3770609/588bcd68fc8e/pone.0074787.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验