Suppr超能文献

比较通过多项选择题和开放式问题衡量的理解能力。

Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions.

作者信息

Ozuru Yasuhiro, Briner Stephen, Kurby Christopher A, McNamara Danielle S

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Sep;67(3):215-27. doi: 10.1037/a0032918.

Abstract

This study compared the nature of text comprehension as measured by multiple-choice format and open-ended format questions. Participants read a short text while explaining preselected sentences. After reading the text, participants answered open-ended and multiple-choice versions of the same questions based on their memory of the text content. The results indicated that performance on open-ended questions was correlated with the quality of self-explanations, but performance on multiple-choice questions was correlated with the level of prior knowledge related to the text. These results suggest that open-ended and multiple-choice format questions measure different aspects of comprehension processes. The results are discussed in terms of dual process theories of text comprehension.

摘要

本研究比较了通过选择题形式和开放式问题形式所衡量的文本理解的本质。参与者在解释预先选定的句子时阅读一篇短文。阅读文本后,参与者根据对文本内容的记忆回答相同问题的开放式和选择题版本。结果表明,开放式问题的表现与自我解释的质量相关,但选择题的表现与与文本相关的先验知识水平相关。这些结果表明,开放式和选择题形式的问题衡量了理解过程的不同方面。根据文本理解的双过程理论对结果进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验