Carmassi Claudia, Shear M Katherine, Socci Chiara, Corsi Martina, Dell'osso Liliana, First Michael B
CARMASSI, SOCCI, CORSI, and DELL'OSSO: University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; SHEAR: Columbia University School of Social Work, New York; FIRST: Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 Sep;19(5):419-28. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000435042.13921.73.
Based on the recommendations of the sub-workgroup on trauma and dissociative disorders, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed the "bereavement exclusion" from the criteria for major depression in DSM-5. In addition, proposed DSM-5 research criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) were included in the new manual in a section for conditions and criteria needing further research. We describe a case that warranted such a diagnosis. The patient was a 52- year-old woman who was admitted to the inpatient unit of our clinic on the birthday of her son who had died 18 months earlier. She was diagnosed with a manic episode with psychotic symptoms according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria and was treated accordingly. Three months after discharge, she made a suicide attempt and was admitted and re-assessed. During this admission, she completed the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG), the Mood-Spectrum Rating Scale (MOODS-SR), and the Trauma and Loss Spectrum questionnaire (TALS-SR). She endorsed symptoms of intense yearning for her son, feelings of shock and disbelief, anger and bitterness related to his death, estrangement from others, auditory, tactile and visual hallucinations of the deceased, and intense emotional reactivity to memories of her son. These symptoms were sufficiently prolonged and severe to meet criteria for complicated grief. While complicated grief appeared to be the primary diagnosis for this patient, when she was diagnosed using only DSMIV-TR criteria, her treatment failed to address herprimary problem. This case draws attention to the occurrence of manic-like symptoms as well as depression-like manifestations following bereavement and highlights the importance of including the syndrome of complicated grief in the diagnostic nomenclature.
根据创伤与分离性障碍分组工作组的建议,美国精神病学协会(APA)在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)中取消了重度抑郁症标准中的“丧亲排除条款”。此外,针对持续性复杂丧亲障碍(PCBD)提出的DSM - 5研究标准被纳入新手册中一个关于需要进一步研究的状况和标准的章节。我们描述了一个有必要做出这种诊断的病例。患者是一名52岁女性,在其18个月前去世儿子的生日当天住进了我们诊所的 inpatient unit 。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版,修订本(DSM - IV - TR)标准,她被诊断为伴有精神病性症状的躁狂发作,并接受了相应治疗。出院三个月后,她试图自杀,随后再次入院并接受重新评估。在这次住院期间,她完成了复杂悲伤量表(ICG)、情绪谱评定量表(MOODS - SR)以及创伤与丧失谱问卷(TALS - SR)。她认可了对儿子强烈的思念、震惊和难以置信的感觉、与儿子死亡相关的愤怒和痛苦、与他人疏远、对死者的听觉、触觉和视觉幻觉,以及对儿子记忆的强烈情绪反应等症状。这些症状持续时间足够长且严重程度足以符合复杂悲伤的标准。虽然复杂悲伤似乎是该患者的主要诊断,但仅依据DSM - IV - TR标准对她进行诊断时,她的治疗未能解决其主要问题。该病例引起了人们对丧亲后出现类似躁狂症状以及类似抑郁表现的关注,并强调了在诊断术语中纳入复杂悲伤综合征的重要性。