Suppr超能文献

使用激光多普勒流量metry 诊断外周动脉疾病时需要测量远端肢体和肱动脉的压力次数。

Number of distal limb and brachial pressure measurements required when diagnosing peripheral arterial disease by laser Doppler flowmetry.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, DK-8800 Viborg, Denmark. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2013 Oct;34(10):1351-62. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/10/1351. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

We examine the reliability of single and repeated blood pressure measurements at ankle, toe, and arm levels for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) by laser Doppler flowmetry. Segmental pressures were measured in 200 patients with known or suspected PAD. Segmental indices were calculated using (1) one measurement [M-1], two measurements [M-2], or by a predefined reproducibility criterion (RC) as well as (2) by using one brachial blood-pressure (BBP-one) or correspondent to each segmental pressure (BBP-all) as reference. The agreement in diagnosis of PAD by Cohen's Kappa was κ = 0.930 when comparing RC to M-1, and κ = 0.977 when comparing RC to M-2. The same comparison showed excellent relative reliability for segmental indices (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ≥ 0.980). Diagnostic classification agreement for BBP-all versus BBP-one were κ = 0.831 for RC, κ = 0.804 for M-1, and κ = 0.847 for M-2. The relative reliability analysis showed excellent correlation in segmental indices (all ICC ≥ 0.957). The study shows minimal difference in segmental indices and diagnostic classification when comparing calculations based on the listed strategies. However, the study indicated that it is important to measure BBPs correspondent to each segmental pressure.

摘要

我们通过激光多普勒流量测定法检验了踝部、趾部和臂部单次和重复血压测量在诊断外周动脉疾病(PAD)方面的可靠性。在 200 名已知或疑似 PAD 患者中测量了节段性血压。使用(1)一次测量值 [M-1]、两次测量值 [M-2] 或根据预定义的可重复性标准 (RC) 以及(2)使用一个肱动脉血压值 (BBP-one) 或与每个节段性血压值相对应的血压值 (BBP-all) 计算节段指数。当比较 RC 与 M-1 时,根据 Cohen's Kappa 诊断 PAD 的一致性为 κ = 0.930,当比较 RC 与 M-2 时,κ = 0.977。同样的比较显示节段指数的相对可靠性非常高(所有组内相关系数 (ICC) ≥ 0.980)。RC 时 BBP-all 与 BBP-one 的诊断分类一致性为 κ = 0.831,M-1 时为 κ = 0.804,M-2 时为 κ = 0.847。相对可靠性分析显示节段指数之间具有极好的相关性(所有 ICC ≥ 0.957)。研究表明,当比较基于所列策略的计算时,节段指数和诊断分类的差异极小。然而,该研究表明测量与每个节段性血压相对应的 BBPs 非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验