Real de Asúa Diego, Puchades Ramón, García-Polo Iluminada, Suárez Carmen
Vascular Risk Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Blood Press Monit. 2012 Apr;17(2):73-5. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328351de79.
The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the most useful and efficient tool for assessing the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple sequential blood pressure (BP) measurements on the estimation of the ABI and the consequent diagnosis of PAD in a high vascular risk population.
This is a cross-sectional study of 71 patients admitted to the Cardiology Department or evaluated as outpatients in the Internal Medicine Department at our institution. The ABI was calculated with the first blood pressure (BP) measurement in the arm with the higher BP (dominant arm; method A) and with the average of the second and third measurements in that same arm (method B). The results of both methods were compared.
No statistically significant difference was found for the numerical value of ABI between the methods. The κ correlation index for agreement in the diagnosis of PAD between the methods was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.99).
Multiple BP measurements had no impact on the final ABI or on the subsequent diagnosis of PAD.
踝臂指数(ABI)是评估外周动脉疾病(PAD)存在情况最有用且高效的工具。本研究的目的是评估多次连续血压(BP)测量对高血管风险人群中ABI估计及随后PAD诊断的影响。
这是一项对我院心内科收治或内科门诊评估的71例患者的横断面研究。ABI通过在血压较高的手臂(优势臂;方法A)进行首次血压测量计算得出,以及通过同一手臂第二次和第三次测量的平均值计算得出(方法B)。比较两种方法的结果。
两种方法之间ABI的数值未发现统计学显著差异。两种方法在PAD诊断一致性方面的κ相关指数为0.87(95%置信区间:0.74 - 0.99)。
多次血压测量对最终的ABI或随后的PAD诊断没有影响。