Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, University of Bologna, Bologna, BO, Italy,
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S101-3. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Reconstruction of bone defects is a challenge for all orthopedic surgeons worldwide; to overcome this problem there are different options: the use of autografts, allografts and bone substitutes (BSs) to enhance and accelerate bone repair. Autografts have excellent biological properties but are associated with morbidity of the donor site and are restricted in volume. Allografts are available in adequate quantity but concerns still remain about the risk of infections, moreover they do not have osteogenetic properties. Bone substitutes have different indications and are very attractive for orthopedic surgeons. The present paper briefly reviews the advantages and disadvantages of autografts, allografts and BSs for bone reconstruction.
骨缺损的重建是全世界所有骨科医生面临的挑战;为了克服这个问题,有不同的选择:使用自体移植物、同种异体移植物和骨替代物(BSs)来增强和加速骨修复。自体移植物具有极好的生物学特性,但与供体部位的发病率有关,而且体积有限。同种异体移植物的数量充足,但人们仍然担心感染的风险,此外,它们没有成骨特性。骨替代物有不同的适应症,对骨科医生很有吸引力。本文简要回顾了自体移植物、同种异体移植物和 BSs 用于骨重建的优缺点。