Suppr超能文献

交替激活的骨髓巨噬细胞的肾脏保护作用失败是由于体内增殖依赖性表型转换所致。

Failed renoprotection by alternatively activated bone marrow macrophages is due to a proliferation-dependent phenotype switch in vivo.

机构信息

Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Pediatrics, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2014 Apr;85(4):794-806. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.341. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Abstract

Alternatively activated macrophages (M2) regulate immune responses and ex vivo polarized splenic M2 are able to ameliorate renal injury including models of renal disease, such as adriamycin nephropathy. Whether M2 derived from other organs have similar protective efficacy is unknown. Here, we report adoptively transferred bone marrow M2 macrophages did not improve renal function or reduce renal injury in adriamycin nephropathy, whereas splenic M2 macrophages were protective. Bone marrow and splenic M2 macrophages showed similar regulatory phenotypes and suppressive functions in vitro. Within the inflamed kidney, suppressive phenotypes in bone marrow but not in splenic M2 macrophages, were dramatically reduced. Loss of the suppressive phenotype in bone marrow M2 was related to strong proliferation of bone marrow M2. Bone marrow M2 proliferation in vivo correlated with M-CSF expression by tubular cells in the inflamed kidney. Inhibition of M-CSF in vitro limited bone marrow M2 proliferation and prevented switch of phenotype. Proliferating cells derived from transfused bone marrow M2 were inflammatory rather than regulatory in their phenotype and function. Thus bone marrow in contrast to splenic M2 macrophages do not protect against renal structural and functional injury in murine adriamycin nephropathy. The failed renoprotection of bone marrow M2 is due to the switch of transfused M2 macrophages from a regulatory to an inflammatory phenotype.

摘要

alternatively activated macrophages (M2) 调节免疫反应,体外极化的脾 M2 能够改善包括肾病模型在内的肾损伤,如阿霉素肾病。尚不清楚来自其他器官的 M2 是否具有类似的保护效果。在这里,我们报告说,过继转移的骨髓 M2 巨噬细胞不能改善阿霉素肾病的肾功能或减轻肾损伤,而脾 M2 巨噬细胞具有保护作用。骨髓和脾 M2 巨噬细胞在体外表现出相似的调节表型和抑制功能。在炎症肾脏中,骨髓中抑制性表型明显减少,但脾 M2 巨噬细胞中没有减少。骨髓 M2 抑制性表型的丧失与骨髓 M2 的强烈增殖有关。体内骨髓 M2 的增殖与炎症肾脏中肾小管细胞的 M-CSF 表达相关。体外抑制 M-CSF 可限制骨髓 M2 的增殖并防止表型转换。来自输注的骨髓 M2 的增殖细胞在表型和功能上是炎症性的而不是调节性的。因此,与脾 M2 巨噬细胞相比,骨髓不能防止小鼠阿霉素肾病的肾结构和功能损伤。骨髓 M2 未能保护肾脏免受损伤是由于输注的 M2 巨噬细胞从调节性表型转变为炎症性表型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验