• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声刀与电刀在胃癌开腹手术中应用的随机对照研究。

Ultrasonically activated shears versus electrocautery in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):556-61. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0301-7. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-013-0301-7
PMID:24048759
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) is gaining popularity in open surgery but without concrete evidence. We conducted a prospectively randomized study to assess the efficacy of ultrasonic dissection in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer who were to undergo gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n = 125) or the UAS group (n = 128).

RESULTS

The mean operating time was significantly reduced in the UAS group (89.3 ± 15.6 min) when compared to the conventional group (97.8 ± 17.2 min; p < 0.001). However, we did not find any significant difference in operative blood loss, the amount of postoperative abdominal drainage, or the rate of postoperative complications between the groups. A multivariate analysis for operating time revealed that the use of UAS, female gender and BMI less than 25 were significantly associated with reduced operating time. The operating time was significantly longer in the conventional group than in the UAS group (B 7.786; 95 % CI 4.103-11.468; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the use of UAS significantly reduced the operating time, especially in male patients, regardless of the BMI status.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer was a safe and efficient method, especially in terms of reducing operating time for male patients.

摘要

背景

超声刀(UAS)在开放手术中越来越受欢迎,但缺乏具体证据。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估超声切割在胃癌开放性胃切除术中的疗效。

方法

将接受胃癌根治术和 D2 淋巴结清扫术的胃癌患者纳入并随机分为常规手术组(n=125)和 UAS 组(n=128)。

结果

与常规组(97.8±17.2min)相比,UAS 组的平均手术时间明显缩短(89.3±15.6min;p<0.001)。然而,两组间手术出血量、术后腹腔引流量和术后并发症发生率无显著差异。多因素分析显示,UAS 的使用、女性和 BMI<25 与手术时间缩短显著相关。常规组的手术时间明显长于 UAS 组(B 7.786;95%CI 4.103-11.468;p<0.001)。亚组分析显示,UAS 的使用显著缩短了手术时间,尤其是在男性患者中,无论 BMI 状态如何。

结论

UAS 在胃癌根治术中是一种安全有效的方法,尤其是可以缩短男性患者的手术时间。

相似文献

1
Ultrasonically activated shears versus electrocautery in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.超声刀与电刀在胃癌开腹手术中应用的随机对照研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):556-61. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0301-7. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
2
Ultrasonically Activated Shears Reduce Blood Loss without Increasing Inflammatory Reactions in Open Distal Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study.超声激活剪刀在开放性远端胃癌根治术中减少失血且不增加炎症反应:一项随机对照研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;24(2):494-501. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5518-3. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
3
Ultrasonic dissection versus conventional electrocautery during gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.胃癌胃切除术中超声刀解剖与传统电灼术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;41(4):527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的短期手术效果比较:一项随机对照试验的结果
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2427-2433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Study of celiac artery variations and related surgical techniques in gastric cancer.胃癌中腹腔干变异及相关手术技术的研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 14;21(22):6944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6944.
6
Ultrasonic scalpel for gastric cancer surgery: a prospective randomized study.胃癌手术用超声刀:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1840-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1970-y. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.一项比较进展期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治术的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):331-7. doi: 10.1159/000330782. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
8
Ultrasonically activated shears in gastrectomy for large gastric cancers.超声激活剪在大型胃癌胃切除术中的应用
Surg Today. 2007;37(12):1060-3. doi: 10.1007/s00595-007-3551-3. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与传统开腹胃癌根治术的长期预后比较,尤其在 D2 淋巴结清扫方面。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2240-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2167-x. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
10
Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study.局部进展期远端胃癌行 D2 与 D2 加根治术的对比:一项随机对照研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial.超声刀在胃癌手术中应用的肿瘤学安全性:随机对照试验的长期结果
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;30(5):492-499. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02.
2
Viability of Airborne Tumor Cells during Excision by Ultrasonic Device.超声设备切除过程中空气传播肿瘤细胞的生存能力。
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:4907576. doi: 10.1155/2017/4907576. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
3
Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotics: a prospective randomized study comparing the conventional diathermy and the harmonic scalpel for gallbladder dissection.肝硬化患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项比较传统电刀和超声刀进行胆囊解剖的前瞻性随机研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0255. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
2
Long term trends and the future gastric cancer mortality in Korea: 1983~2013.韩国胃癌死亡率的长期趋势和未来预测:1983~2013 年。
Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Feb;38(1):7-12. doi: 10.4143/crt.2006.38.1.7. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
3
Ultrasonically activated device for parenchymal division during open hepatectomy.
胃癌的胃切除术和D2淋巴结清扫术:比较超声刀与传统技术的Meta分析
Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:397260. doi: 10.1155/2015/397260. Epub 2015 May 14.
超声激活装置在开腹肝切除术中用于实质分割。
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(4):234-8. doi: 10.1080/13651820802166906.
4
Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.单极剪刀、双极血管闭合器和超声刀在腹腔镜结直肠手术中的前瞻性随机研究。
Br J Surg. 2008 Sep;95(9):1098-104. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6321.
5
D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.单独进行D2淋巴结清扫术或联合腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):453-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707035.
6
Ultrasonically activated shears in gastrectomy for large gastric cancers.超声激活剪在大型胃癌胃切除术中的应用
Surg Today. 2007;37(12):1060-3. doi: 10.1007/s00595-007-3551-3. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Abdominal shape of gastric cancer patients influences short-term surgical outcomes.胃癌患者的腹部形态影响手术短期疗效。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1288-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9235-1.
8
Experimental evaluation of bursting pressure in lymphatic vessels with ultrasonically activated shears.
World J Surg. 2005 Jan;29(1):106-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7547-5.
9
Mechanisms of peritoneal metastasis after operation for non-serosa-invasive gastric carcinoma: an ultrarapid detection system for intraperitoneal free cancer cells and a prophylactic strategy for peritoneal metastasis.非浆膜浸润性胃癌术后腹膜转移机制:腹腔游离癌细胞超快速检测系统及腹膜转移预防策略
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Feb;9(2):678-85.
10
Use of ultrasonically activated shears improves the safety of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.超声激活剪刀的使用提高了胰十二指肠切除术后胰空肠吻合术的安全性。
Arch Surg. 2002 Nov;137(11):1258-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1258.