• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的短期手术效果比较:一项随机对照试验的结果

Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2427-2433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x
PMID:29234941
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) has gained acceptance as one of the best treatments for early gastric cancer. However, the application of LAG with D2 lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial.

METHODS

We launched a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally AGC to evaluate technical safety and oncologic feasibility. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were based on the modified intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and June 2012, a total of 328 patients with preoperative clinical stage TNM gastric cancer were enrolled in the trial. Six patients with unresected AGC were excluded, and the remaining 322 patients were randomized to the laparoscopic group (162 patients) or the open group (160 patients) for radical surgery. All patients underwent D2 lymph node dissection including 18 (5.59%) proximal gastrectomies, 196 (60.87%) distal gastrectomies, and 108 (33.54%) total gastrectomies. Six patients (3.70%) in the LAG group were converted to open procedures. The overall complication rate was 11.72% in the LAG group and 14.38% in the open group (P = 0.512). No mortality occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term results of the current study suggest that LAG with D2 lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible procedure in treating patients with locally AGC in experienced centers.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LAG)已被公认为治疗早期胃癌的最佳方法之一。然而,对于局部进展期胃癌(AGC)患者,LAG 联合 D2 淋巴结清扫的应用仍存在争议。

方法

我们开展了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较腹腔镜和开腹胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗局部 AGC,以评估技术安全性和肿瘤学可行性。术后发病率和死亡率基于意向治疗分析。

结果

2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月,共有 328 例术前临床分期为 TNM 胃癌患者入组本试验。有 6 例未切除的 AGC 患者被排除,其余 322 例患者被随机分为腹腔镜组(162 例)或开腹组(160 例)行根治性手术。所有患者均行 D2 淋巴结清扫术,其中 18 例行近端胃切除术(5.59%),196 例行远端胃切除术(60.87%),108 例行全胃切除术(33.54%)。腹腔镜组中有 6 例(3.70%)患者转为开腹手术。腹腔镜组的总并发症发生率为 11.72%,开腹组为 14.38%(P=0.512)。两组均无死亡病例。

结论

本研究的短期结果表明,在经验丰富的中心,LAG 联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗局部 AGC 是一种安全可行的方法。

相似文献

1
Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的短期手术效果比较:一项随机对照试验的结果
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2427-2433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Long-term oncologic outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的长期肿瘤学结果的随机对照研究
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1211-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与传统开腹胃癌根治术的长期预后比较,尤其在 D2 淋巴结清扫方面。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2240-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2167-x. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
4
Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision, D2 + CME) with conventional D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(D2淋巴结清扫术加完整胃系膜切除术,D2+CME)与传统D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃腺癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 9;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2790-5.
5
A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.一项比较进展期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治术的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):331-7. doi: 10.1159/000330782. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).一项多机构前瞻性II期可行性研究:腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌(JLSSG0901)
World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2734-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z.
7
Laparoscopy-assisted versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Results From a Randomized Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (COACT 1001).腹腔镜辅助与开腹 D2 远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的随机Ⅱ期多中心临床试验(COACT 1001)结果
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):638-645. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002168.
8
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.一项比较腹腔镜与开放胃癌根治术D2淋巴结清扫术的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):241. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0680-1. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
Feasibility and safety comparison of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma with D2 lymphadenectomy.腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的可行性及安全性比较
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;46(4):323-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw001. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜全胃及部分胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗腺癌
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0129-0. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of KLASS-02 and CLASS-01 randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的长期疗效:KLASS - 02和CLASS - 01随机对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析
Chin J Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;37(3):365-376. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.03.06.
2
Risk factors as criteria for drain use in gastrectomy: A prospective study.胃癌根治术中引流使用标准的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 26;23(2):75. doi: 10.3892/mco.2025.2870. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Minimally invasive lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: Could the robotic approach provide any benefits than laparoscopy?

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912.一项针对临床IA/IB期胃癌行腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃切除术并清扫淋巴结的III期研究的短期手术结果:日本临床肿瘤学组研究JCOG0912
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jul;20(4):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
2
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center.腹腔镜辅助根治性胃切除术与开腹根治性胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的比较:在单一微创手术中心的回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(25):e3936. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003936.
3
胃癌的微创淋巴结清扫术:机器人手术方式比腹腔镜手术有优势吗?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):104015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.104015.
4
Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review by the Robotic Global Surgical Society (TROGSS) and European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery (EFISDS) Joint Working Group.评估机器人手术在胃癌治疗中的作用:机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)和欧洲国际消化外科学会联合会(EFISDS)联合工作组的综合综述
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 31;32(2):83. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32020083.
5
Current clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery in China.中国目前关于胃癌手术的临床试验。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):4369-4382. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4369.
6
Short-Term Outcomes Analysis Comparing Open, Laparoscopic, Laparoscopic-Assisted, and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Trials Network Analysis.比较开放手术、腹腔镜手术、腹腔镜辅助手术和机器人辅助远端胃癌切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的短期结果分析:一项随机试验网络分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 23;16(9):1620. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091620.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜与开放胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Jun;55(2):652-661. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01048-0. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
8
The inflammation score predicts the prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing Da Vinci robot surgery.炎症评分可预测达芬奇机器人手术治疗胃癌患者的预后。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 18;18(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01840-x.
9
Reliability and validity analyses of the postoperative comfort scale for patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery and an evaluation of patient comfort.肺癌内镜手术后患者舒适度量表的信度和效度分析及患者舒适度评价。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(4):2331-2343. doi: 10.3233/THC-231102.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03269-2.
Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D2 远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon Experienced in Open Gastrectomy: Review of Initial Experience.由一位有开放胃切除术经验的外科医生实施的腹腔镜全胃切除术的短期结果:初步经验回顾
J Gastric Cancer. 2015 Sep;15(3):159-66. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.159. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).与开放性远端胃癌切除术相比,腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗Ⅰ期胃癌的发病率降低:一项多中心随机对照试验(KLASS-01)的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
6
A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).一项多机构前瞻性II期可行性研究:腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌(JLSSG0901)
World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2734-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z.
7
Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for upper and middle gastric cancer in short-term and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术与开腹全胃切除术治疗胃中上段癌的短期和长期疗效比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Jun;24(3):277-82. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182901290.
8
Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的肿瘤学结局:来自中国的一项大规模多中心回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2048-56. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3426-9. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study.腹腔镜胃癌根治术的长期疗效:一项大规模病例对照和病例匹配的韩国多中心研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study.腹腔镜辅助与开腹全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项病例对照研究的长期结果和技术方面。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1202-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2218-1. Epub 2013 May 17.