Valvar stenosis: a comparison of clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound and catheterisation.

The relative merits of noninvasive techniques in the assessment of valve stenosis were examined by comparing the results of clinical assessment by two independent clinicians, the cross-sectional echocardiogram and Doppler ultrasound using the results of cardiac catheterisation as reference in 58 patients with a total of 60 stenotic valve lesions. Doppler ultrasound was the most reliable technique; it was correct in 57 (95%) of the 60 lesions. Clinical assessment and cross sectional echocardiography were correct in 48 (80%), and 46 (77%) of the 60 lesions, respectively. In 7 instances 2 noninvasive assessments were wrong in the same patient but on no occasion were all 3 techniques misleading in the same patient. In 17 patients with severe mitral stenosis, clinical assessment Doppler ultrasound and cross-sectional echocardiography were correct in 14 (82%), 16 (94%) and 17 (100%) patients, respectively, whilst in the 4 patients with moderate mitral stenosis the corresponding figures were 3 (75%), 4 (100%) and 2 (50%). In mild mitral stenosis (3 patients), the clinical assessment was correct in 2 (67%) patients, Doppler ultrasound in 3 (100%) patients and cross-sectional echocardiography in 2 (67%) patients. In 22 patients with severe aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound were correct in every patient (100%), whilst the cross-sectional echocardiogram was correct in 18 (82%) patients. In 11 patients with moderate aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment was correct in only 5 (45%) patients, the cross-sectional echocardiogram in 5 (45%) patients and Doppler assessment in 9 (82%) patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)