a Department of Biomolecular and Sports Sciences , Coventry University , Coventry , UK.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(5):559-66. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2012.752039. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of exercise intensity on coincidence anticipation timing [CAT] performance at different stimulus speeds. Fourteen young adults (11 males and 3 females) volunteered to participate in the study following ethical approval. After familiarisation, coincidence anticipation was measured using the Bassin Anticipation Timer under three conditions: rest, moderate-intensity and high-intensity exercise with stimulus speeds of 3, 5 and 8 mph, set using an incremental running protocol until the participants reached a steady state of 70% and 90% of heart rate reserve (HRR), respectively. Results indicated a significant exercise intensity × stimulus speed interaction (p=0.0001) for absolute error (AE). There were no significant differences in AE across exercise intensities at a stimulus speed of 3 mph (p>0.05). AE was poorer during high-intensity exercise (90% HRR) compared to rest (p=0.022), and moderate-intensity (70% HRR) exercise (all, p=0.004 or better) at 5 and 8 mph. Variable error (VE) was similar across exercise intensities at stimulus speeds of both 3 and 5 mph (p>0.05). At a stimulus speed of 8 mph, VE was significantly poorer during high-intensity exercise compared to rest (p=0.006) and moderate-intensity exercise (p=0.008). There were no significant differences for constant error (p>0.05) across exercise intensities or stimulus speeds. High-intensity exercise is associated with poorer CAT performance. However, stimulus speed plays a key role within this association where faster stimulus speeds were associated with a more marked decrease in coincidence anticipation performance.
本研究旨在探讨不同刺激速度下运动强度对巧合预期计时[CAT]表现的影响。14 名年轻成年人(男性 11 名,女性 3 名)在获得伦理批准后自愿参加研究。在熟悉之后,使用 Bassin 预期计时器在三种条件下测量巧合预期:休息、中等强度和高强度运动,刺激速度分别为 3、5 和 8 英里/小时,使用递增跑步方案设置,直到参与者分别达到心率储备的 70%和 90%的稳定状态。结果表明,绝对误差(AE)的运动强度×刺激速度交互作用有统计学意义(p=0.0001)。在刺激速度为 3 英里/小时时,AE 在运动强度之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。与休息相比,高强度运动(90%HRR)时的 AE 较差(p=0.022),与中等强度运动(70%HRR)时的 AE 也较差(均为 p=0.004 或更好)。在刺激速度为 3 和 5 英里/小时时,VE 在运动强度之间相似(p>0.05)。在刺激速度为 8 英里/小时时,与休息和中等强度运动相比,高强度运动时的 VE 较差(p=0.006 和 p=0.008)。在运动强度或刺激速度之间,恒定误差没有显著差异(p>0.05)。高强度运动与 CAT 表现较差相关。然而,刺激速度在这种关联中起着关键作用,较快的刺激速度与巧合预期表现的明显下降有关。