Hu Amanda, Moore Jaime Eaglin, Rose Bridget, Fort Stephanie, Gracely Edward J, Sataloff Robert T
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
J Voice. 2014 Jan;28(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Although oral topical anesthesia is used routinely before rigid laryngeal endoscopy, no study has determined whether oral topical anesthesia changes voice quality. Our goal was to determine the effects of topical anesthesia on voice.
Prospective cohort study.
Adult patients presenting to a laryngology practice who required rigid laryngeal endoscopy as part of the routine clinical visit were eligible for the study. Voices were recorded before and after oral topical benzocaine (14%)/butamben (2%)/tetracaine (2%) (ie, cetacaine) spray. Consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V) protocol was used for the voice recordings and was the primary outcome measure. Recordings were presented randomly to two blinded speech-language pathologists specialized in voice. Secondary outcome measures were fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio (N/H) on sustained /i/ and speaking F0.
One hundred two patients participated in the study. There was no significant difference in CAPE-V measurements before and after topical anesthesia for all six attributes: overall severity (P = 0.145), roughness (P = 0.214), breathiness (P = 0.761), strain (P = 0.053), pitch (P = 0.301), and loudness (P = 0.320). There was no significant difference in jitter (P = 0.315), shimmer (P = 0.942), N/H (P = 0.128), and speaking F0 (P = 0.320). F0 /i/ decreased by a mean of 4.8Hz, which was statistically significant (P = 0.003), but probably not clinically significant.
There was no clinically significant voice change after oral topical anesthesia.
目的/假设:尽管在硬质喉镜检查前常规使用口腔局部麻醉,但尚无研究确定口腔局部麻醉是否会改变嗓音质量。我们的目标是确定局部麻醉对嗓音的影响。
前瞻性队列研究。
到喉科就诊且需要进行硬质喉镜检查作为常规临床检查一部分的成年患者符合本研究条件。在口腔喷洒局部麻醉剂苯佐卡因(14%)/布坦卡因(2%)/丁卡因(2%)(即西他卡因)前后记录嗓音。采用嗓音的共识听觉感知评估(CAPE-V)方案进行嗓音记录,这是主要的结局指标。录音随机呈现给两名专门从事嗓音研究的盲法言语病理学家。次要结局指标为持续发/i/音和说话基频(F0)时的基频、抖动、闪烁和噪声谐波比(N/H)。
102例患者参与了本研究。局部麻醉前后,CAPE-V测量的所有六个属性均无显著差异:总体严重程度(P = 0.145)、粗糙程度(P = 0.214)度、呼吸音(P = 0.761)、紧张度(P = 0.053)、音高(P = 0.301)和响度(P = 0.320)。抖动(P = 0.315)、闪烁(P = .942)、N/H(P = 0.128)和说话F0(P = 0.320)均无显著差异。发/i/音时的F0平均下降4.8Hz,具有统计学意义(P = 0.003),但可能无临床意义。结论:口腔局部麻醉后无具有临床意义的嗓音变化。