Suppr超能文献

超重人群能量评估方法的比较。

Comparison of energy assessment methods in overweight individuals.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Feb;114(2):273-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

Abstract

Practical methods of assessing resting energy expenditure (REE) could be useful in large populations of overweight and obese individuals during phases of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance to address weight regain. We compared predicted and measured REE using the MedGem handheld device and a traditional, indirect calorimeter in middle-aged men and women who were overweight and obese (body mass index ≥ 25.0 and <40.0). Each subject (n=88) completed traditional, indirect calorimetry and handheld calorimetry in random order. A subset of participants (n=10) completed each of these assessments at three different time points to examine their test-retest reliability. We found that MedGem estimates of REE were significantly greater than estimates with the traditional, indirect calorimeter and the predicted REE using the Harris-Benedict equation (P<0.01). Intra-class correlations were .70 (P=0.15) for repeated recordings with the MedGem and .84 (P=0.65) for traditional indirect calorimetry. The MedGem can overestimate REE in middle-aged overweight/obese individuals and has moderate test-retest reliability. Indirect calorimetry is the preferred measurement of REE in this population.

摘要

评估静息能量消耗(REE)的实用方法可能对处于减肥和减肥维持阶段的超重和肥胖人群的大量个体有用,以解决体重反弹问题。我们比较了 MedGem 手持设备和传统间接测热法在超重和肥胖(体重指数≥25.0 且<40.0)的中年男女中预测和测量的 REE。每个受试者(n=88)随机完成传统间接测热法和手持测热法。一部分参与者(n=10)在三个不同时间点完成了这些评估,以检查其测试-重测可靠性。我们发现,MedGem 对 REE 的估计明显高于传统间接测热法和 Harris-Benedict 方程(P<0.01)的预测值。MedGem 的重复记录的组内相关系数为.70(P=0.15),传统间接测热法为.84(P=0.65)。MedGem 可能高估了中年超重/肥胖个体的 REE,且具有中等的测试-重测可靠性。在该人群中,间接测热法是 REE 的首选测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验