Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中评估超重和肥胖青少年的静息能量消耗:手持式间接热量计的有效性

Assessing resting energy expenditure in overweight and obese adolescents in a clinical setting: validity of a handheld indirect calorimeter.

作者信息

Woo Paula, Murthy Gayathri, Wong Cindy, Hursh Brenden, Chanoine Jean-Pierre, Elango Rajavel

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Research Institute, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2017 Jan;81(1-1):51-56. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.182. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately determining energy requirements is key for nutritional management of pediatric obesity. Recently, a portable handheld indirect calorimeter, MedGem (MG) has become available to measure resting energy expenditure (REE). Our work aims to determine the clinical validity and usefulness of MG to measure REE in overweight and obese adolescents.

METHODS

Thirty-nine overweight and obese adolescents (16 male (M): 23 female (F), 15.2 ± 1.9 y, BMI percentile: 98.6 ± 2.2%) and 15 normal weight adolescents (7M: 8F, age 15.2 ± 2.0 y, BMI percentile: 39.2 ± 20.9%) participated. REE was measured with both MG and standard indirect calorimeter (VMax) in random order.

RESULTS

MG REE (1,600 ± 372 kcal/d) was lower than VMax REE (1,727 ± 327 kcal/) in the overweight and obese adolescents. Bland Altman analysis (MG -VMax) showed a mean bias of -127 kcal/d (95% CI = -72 to -182 kcal/d, P < 0.001), and a proportional bias existed such that lower measured REE by VMax was underestimated by MG, and higher measured REE by VMax were overestimated by MG.

CONCLUSION

MG systematically underestimates REE in the overweight and adolescent population, thus the MG portable indirect calorimeter is not recommended for routine use. Considering that it is a systematic underestimation of REE, MG may be clinically acceptable, only if used with caution.

摘要

背景

准确确定能量需求是儿童肥胖营养管理的关键。最近,一种便携式手持式间接热量计MedGem(MG)已可用于测量静息能量消耗(REE)。我们的研究旨在确定MG在测量超重和肥胖青少年REE方面的临床有效性和实用性。

方法

39名超重和肥胖青少年(16名男性:23名女性,15.2±1.9岁,BMI百分位数:98.6±2.2%)和15名正常体重青少年(7名男性:8名女性,年龄15.2±2.0岁,BMI百分位数:39.2±20.9%)参与了研究。REE通过MG和标准间接热量计(VMax)以随机顺序进行测量。

结果

在超重和肥胖青少年中,MG测量的REE(1600±372千卡/天)低于VMax测量的REE(1727±327千卡/天)。Bland Altman分析(MG - VMax)显示平均偏差为-127千卡/天(95%CI = -72至-182千卡/天,P < 0.001),并且存在比例偏差,即VMax测量的较低REE被MG低估,VMax测量的较高REE被MG高估。

结论

MG系统性地低估了超重和青少年人群的REE,因此不建议将MG便携式间接热量计用于常规使用。考虑到这是对REE的系统性低估,只有在谨慎使用的情况下,MG在临床上才可能是可接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验