Suppr超能文献

女性压力性尿失禁的微创技术:方法、原理、时机。

Minimally invasive techniques for female stress urinary incontinence, how, why, when.

机构信息

2nd University Department of Obstetrics of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;288(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3024-4. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

Abstract

AIM

The main purpose of this paper is to summarize the recent experience that has been obtained till now in the surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence with less invasive techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used current literature and papers published in MEDLINE and Cochrane library. The keywords used for this review were Stress urinary incontinence, Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), Transobturator tape (TOT, TVT-O), and Single-incision mini-slings (SIMS).

RESULTS

Tension-free vaginal tape and the transobturator urethral suspension are the most commonly used surgical approach for women who suffer from stress urinary incontinence, with long-term success rates ranging from 84 to 95 %. TVT is shown to be as effective as the older colposuspension, associated with less post-operative complications, shorter hospital stay and shorter recovery period. Bladder perforations that have been mentioned with the TVT inserter apparently do not result in any clinically significant morbidity. Major vascular and bowel injuries have been reported at rates of 0.07 and 0.04 %, respectively. Studies between TVT-O and TOT show equal effectiveness with slightly lower cure rates than TVT group, but TOT had a significant lower risk of bladder and vaginal perforations. There were no significant differences in objective cure rates between 'inside-out' and 'outside-in' transobturator tapes. Very recently a meta-analysis does not support routine use of SIMS in clinical practice, moreover suggested the retropubic TVT as the preferred choice for the management of stress urinary incontinence due to familiarity, its effectiveness, minimal invasiveness and low complication and morbidity rates as a primary procedure. Similar results have been announced in a randomized control trial in USA.

CONCLUSIONS

Certainly, larger randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up about the mentioned techniques are needed to accurately determine the efficacy and safety of the mentioned minimally invasive techniques.

摘要

目的

本文的主要目的是总结目前为止微创手术治疗尿失禁的经验。

材料与方法

我们使用了当前的文献和发表在 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆的论文。本次综述使用的关键词为压力性尿失禁、无张力阴道吊带术(TVT)、经闭孔尿道悬吊带术(TOT、TVT-O)和单切口迷你吊带术(SIMS)。

结果

对于患有压力性尿失禁的女性,无张力阴道吊带术和经闭孔尿道悬吊术是最常用的手术方法,长期成功率为 84%至 95%。TVT 与较旧的耻骨后悬吊术一样有效,术后并发症更少,住院时间和恢复期更短。TVT 插入器引起的膀胱穿孔显然不会导致任何有临床意义的发病率。报道的主要血管和肠损伤发生率分别为 0.07%和 0.04%。TVT-O 和 TOT 之间的研究表明疗效相等,治愈率略低于 TVT 组,但 TOT 膀胱和阴道穿孔的风险明显较低。经闭孔“内-外”和“外-内”吊带术之间在客观治愈率方面没有显著差异。最近的一项荟萃分析不支持在临床实践中常规使用 SIMS,并且建议经耻骨后 TVT 作为治疗压力性尿失禁的首选方法,因为其熟悉度、有效性、微创性以及低并发症和发病率作为主要手术方法。美国的一项随机对照试验也公布了类似的结果。

结论

当然,需要进行更大规模的、具有更长随访时间的随机临床试验,以准确确定这些微创技术的疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验