Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Second Floor, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):567-591. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 May 4.
Retropubic (RP-TVT) and transobturator miurethral (TO-TVT) midurethral sling (MUS) are popular surgical treatments for female stress urinary incontinence. The long-term efficacy and safety of the procedures is still a topic of intense clinical research and several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published in the last years OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUS compared with other surgical treatments for female stress urinary incontinence.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to update our previously published analyses.
Twenty-eight RCTs were identified. In total, the meta-analyses included 15 855 patients. Patients receiving MUS had significantly higher overall (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, p=0.0003) and objective (OR: 0.51, p=0.001) cure rates than those receiving Burch colposuspension. Patients undergoing MUS and pubovaginal slings had similar cure rates. Patients treated with RT-TVT had higher subjective (OR: 0.83, p=0.03) and objective (OR: 0.82, p=0.01) cure rates than those receiving TO-TVT. However, the latter had a lower risk of intraoperative bladder or vaginal perforation (OR: 2.4, p=0.0002), pelvic haematoma (OR: 2.61, p=0.002), urinary tract infections (OR: 1.31, p=0.04) and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (OR: 1.66, p=0.002). Sensitivity analyses limited to RCTs with follow-up durations >60 mo demonstrated similar outcomes for RP-TVT and TO-TVT. No significant differences in efficacy were identified comparing inside-to-out and outside-to-in TO-TVT but vaginal perforations were less common with the former (OR: 0.21, p=0.0002).
The present analysis confirms the superiority of MUS over Burch colposuspension. The studies comparing insertion of RT-TVT and TO-TVT showed higher subjective and objective cure rates for the RP-TVT but at the cost of higher risks of some complications and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms. Efficacy of inside-out and outside-in techniques of TO-TVT insertion was similar, although the risk of vaginal perforation was lower in the inside-to-out TO-TVT.
Retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings are a popular treatment for female stress urinary incontinence. The available literature suggest that those slings are either more effective or safer than other older surgical procedures. Retropubic tapes are followed with slightly higher continence rates as compared with the transobturator tapes but are associated with higher risk of intra- and postoperative complications.
经耻骨后(RP-TVT)和经闭孔尿道中段吊带(TO-TVT)是治疗女性压力性尿失禁的常用手术方法。这些手术的长期疗效和安全性仍然是一个备受关注的临床研究课题,近年来已经发表了几项随机对照试验(RCT)。目的:评估 MUS 与其他治疗女性压力性尿失禁的手术方法相比的疗效和安全性。
使用 Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库对文献进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以更新我们之前发表的分析。
确定了 28 项 RCT。共有 15855 名患者参与了meta 分析。与接受 Burch 耻骨悬吊带治疗的患者相比,接受 MUS 治疗的患者总体(比值比 [OR]:0.59,p=0.0003)和客观(OR:0.51,p=0.001)治愈率显著更高。接受 MUS 和耻骨阴道吊带治疗的患者治愈率相似。接受 RT-TVT 治疗的患者主观(OR:0.83,p=0.03)和客观(OR:0.82,p=0.01)治愈率均高于接受 TO-TVT 治疗的患者。然而,后者发生术中膀胱或阴道穿孔(OR:2.4,p=0.0002)、盆腔血肿(OR:2.61,p=0.002)、尿路感染(OR:1.31,p=0.04)和排尿下尿路症状(OR:1.66,p=0.002)的风险较低。仅限于随访时间超过 60 个月的 RCT 的敏感性分析显示,RP-TVT 和 TO-TVT 的结果相似。比较 RT-TVT 和 TO-TVT 的内外入路发现,两种方法的疗效没有显著差异,但阴道穿孔的风险较低(OR:0.21,p=0.0002)。
本分析证实了 MUS 优于 Burch 耻骨悬吊带。比较 RT-TVT 和 TO-TVT 插入的研究显示,RP-TVT 的主观和客观治愈率更高,但某些并发症和排尿下尿路症状的风险更高。TO-TVT 插入的内外入路技术的疗效相似,尽管阴道穿孔的风险较低。
经耻骨后和经闭孔尿道中段吊带是治疗女性压力性尿失禁的常用方法。现有文献表明,与其他较老的手术方法相比,这些吊带方法要么更有效,要么更安全。与经闭孔吊带相比,经耻骨后吊带的控尿率稍高,但术后并发症和手术风险较高。