• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单功能烷基化剂在大肠杆菌中的遗传毒性效力:与啮齿动物致癌效力的比较。

Genotoxic potency of monofunctional alkylating agents in E. coli: comparison with carcinogenic potency in rodents.

作者信息

Quinto I, Tenenbaum L, Radman M

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biology, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1990 Feb;228(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90074-e.

DOI:10.1016/0027-5107(90)90074-e
PMID:2405262
Abstract

A quantitative correlation between carcinogenicity and genotoxicity was investigated by a comparison between the carcinogenic potency in rodents and the mutagenic (M), recombinogenic (R) and SOS-inducing (I) potencies in a bacterial test (E. coli multitest) for 9 monofunctional alkylating agents: N-nitroso-N-methylurethane, N-nitroso-N-ethylurea, epichlorohydrin, N-nitroso-N-methylurea, N-nitroso-N-methyl-N'-nitroguanidine, methyl methanesulfonate, diethylsulfate, dimethylsulfate, ethyl methanesulfonate. A significant positive correlation between the carcinogenic potency and the product of the mutagenic and recombinogenic potencies was found for all tested compounds. Thus, the E. coli multitest may be used as a simple test to search for correlations between carcinogenicity and genotoxicity of DNA-damaging agents.

摘要

通过比较9种单功能烷基化剂在啮齿动物中的致癌效力与在细菌试验(大肠杆菌多重试验)中的诱变(M)、重组(R)和SOS诱导(I)效力,研究了致癌性与遗传毒性之间的定量相关性。这9种单功能烷基化剂分别为:N-亚硝基-N-甲基脲、N-亚硝基-N-乙基脲、环氧氯丙烷、N-亚硝基-N-甲基脲、N-亚硝基-N-甲基-N'-硝基胍、甲磺酸甲酯、硫酸二乙酯、硫酸二甲酯、甲磺酸乙酯。对于所有测试化合物,发现致癌效力与诱变和重组效力的乘积之间存在显著的正相关。因此,大肠杆菌多重试验可作为一种简单的试验,用于寻找DNA损伤剂的致癌性与遗传毒性之间的相关性。

相似文献

1
Genotoxic potency of monofunctional alkylating agents in E. coli: comparison with carcinogenic potency in rodents.单功能烷基化剂在大肠杆菌中的遗传毒性效力:与啮齿动物致癌效力的比较。
Mutat Res. 1990 Feb;228(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90074-e.
2
Carcinogenic potency in rodents versus genotoxic potency in E. coli: a correlation analysis for bifunctional alkylating agents.
Mutat Res. 1987 Dec;181(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90101-1.
3
Quantification of the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents in bacterial assays.
Mutagenesis. 1988 Jul;3(4):317-22. doi: 10.1093/mutage/3.4.317.
4
Evaluation of the SOS chromotest for detection of genotoxic drugs.
Acta Microbiol Pol. 1993;42(2):205-8.
5
SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.SOS 显色试验结果的更广泛背景:遗传毒性效力、致突变效力和致癌效力之间的经验关系。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;27(4):270-305. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)27:4<270::AID-EM4>3.0.CO;2-H.
6
Induction of SOS repair by monofunctional methanesulphonates in various Escherichia coli strains. Structure-activity relationships in comparison with mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium.
Mutagenesis. 1989 May;4(3):179-86. doi: 10.1093/mutage/4.3.179.
7
International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules.国际环境诱变剂和致癌物防护委员会。烷基化剂与生物大分子反应的微妙之处。
Mutat Res. 1994 Feb 1;305(1):13-32. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90123-6.
8
On the role of alkylating mechanisms, O-alkylation and DNA-repair in genotoxicity and mutagenicity of alkylating methanesulfonates of widely varying structures in bacterial systems.关于烷基化机制、O-烷基化和DNA修复在细菌系统中结构差异很大的烷基化甲磺酸盐的遗传毒性和诱变性中的作用。
Chem Biol Interact. 2001 Jul 31;137(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(01)00211-3.
9
Quantitative comparisons between carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and electrophilicity of direct-acting N-nitroso compounds and other alkylating agents.直接作用的N-亚硝基化合物与其他烷基化剂的致癌性、诱变性和亲电性之间的定量比较。
IARC Sci Publ. 1982(41):525-32.
10
Quantitative comparative mutagenesis in bacteria, mammalian cells, and animal-mediated assays. A convenient way of estimating genotoxic activity in vivo?
Mutat Res. 1985 Jun-Jul;150(1-2):159-75. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(85)90113-7.