Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1941 East Road, Houston TX 77054, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Dec;47(12):1917-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Early responses to stimuli can be measured by sensory evoked potentials (EP) using repeated identical stimuli, S1 and S2. Response to S1 may represent efficient stimulus detection, while suppression of response to S2 may represent inhibition. Early responses to stimuli may be related to impulsivity. We compared EP reflecting stimulus detection and inhibition in bipolar disorder and healthy controls, and investigated relationships to impulsivity. Subjects were 48 healthy controls without family histories of mood disorder and 48 with bipolar disorder. EP were measured as latencies and amplitudes for auditory P50 (pre-attentional), N100 (initial direction of attention) and P200 (initial conscious awareness), using a paired-click paradigm, with identical stimuli 0.5 s apart. Impulsivity was measured by questionnaire and by laboratory tests for inability to suppress responses to stimuli or to delay response for a reward. Analyses used general linear models. S1 amplitudes for P50, N100, and P200, and gating of N100 and P200, were lower in bipolar disorder than in controls. P50 S1 amplitude correlated with accurate laboratory-task responding, and S2 amplitude correlated with impulsive task performance and fast reaction times, in bipolar disorder. N100 and P200 EP did not correlate with impulsivity. These findings were independent of symptoms, treatment, or substance-use history. EPs were not related to questionnaire-measured or reward-based impulsivity. Bipolar I disorder is characterized by reduced pre-attentional and early attentional stimulus registration relative to controls. Within bipolar disorder, rapid-response impulsivity correlates with impaired pre-attentional response suppression. These results imply specific relationships between ERP-measured response inhibition and rapid-response impulsivity.
早期对刺激的反应可以通过使用重复相同刺激 S1 和 S2 的感觉诱发电位 (EP) 来测量。对 S1 的反应可能代表有效的刺激检测,而对 S2 的反应抑制可能代表抑制。早期对刺激的反应可能与冲动有关。我们比较了双相情感障碍和健康对照组中反映刺激检测和抑制的 EP,并研究了它们与冲动性的关系。研究对象为 48 名无心境障碍家族史的健康对照组和 48 名双相情感障碍组。使用成对点击范式,以 0.5 秒的间隔测量听觉 P50(前注意)、N100(注意力的初始方向)和 P200(初始意识)的潜伏期和振幅。使用问卷和实验室测试来测量冲动性,以评估无法抑制对刺激的反应或延迟对奖励的反应的能力。分析使用一般线性模型。与对照组相比,双相情感障碍组的 P50、N100 和 P200 的 S1 振幅以及 N100 和 P200 的门控均降低。P50 S1 振幅与实验室任务的准确反应相关,S2 振幅与冲动任务的表现和快速反应时间相关,在双相情感障碍中。N100 和 P200 EP 与冲动性无关。这些发现与症状、治疗或物质使用史无关。EP 与问卷测量或基于奖励的冲动性无关。双相 I 型障碍的特征是与对照组相比,前注意和早期注意力刺激登记减少。在双相情感障碍中,快速反应冲动性与前注意反应抑制受损有关。这些结果表明 ERP 测量的反应抑制与快速反应冲动性之间存在特定关系。