• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的成本效益分析

Cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.

作者信息

Fernández Lobato Rosa, Ruiz de Adana Belbel Juan Carlos, Angulo Morales Francisco, García Septiem Javier, Marín Lucas Francisco Javier, Limones Esteban Manuel

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, España.

Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp. 2014 Oct;92(8):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.04.012
PMID:24054792
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic surgery is a successful treatment option offering significant advantages to patients compared with open ventral hernia repair. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare the clinical results and economic costs of the open and laparoscopic techniques for anterior abdominal wall hernia repair, in order to determine the more efficient procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 140 patients with primary and incisional hernia, and analyzed clinical data, morbidity, costs of surgery and hospital stay costs.

RESULTS

The cost of disposable surgical supplies was higher with laparoscopic repair but reduced the average length of stay (P<.001) and patient morbidity (P<.001). The total cost of the laparoscopic procedure was, therefore, less than initially estimated, yielding a savings of 1,260€ per patient (2,865€ vs. 4,125€).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is associated with a reduced complication rate, a lower average length of stay and with lower total costs. Laparoscopic repair can save 1.260€ for each patient, and so this procedure should be considered a cost-effective approach.

摘要

目的

与开放性腹疝修补术相比,腹腔镜手术是一种成功的治疗选择,为患者带来显著优势。进行成本效益分析以比较开放性和腹腔镜技术用于前腹壁疝修补术的临床结果和经济成本,从而确定更有效的手术方法。

材料与方法

我们对140例原发性和切口疝患者进行了前瞻性研究,并分析了临床数据、发病率、手术成本和住院费用。

结果

腹腔镜修补术的一次性手术耗材成本较高,但缩短了平均住院时间(P<0.001)并降低了患者发病率(P<0.001)。因此,腹腔镜手术的总成本低于最初估计,每位患者节省1260欧元(2865欧元对4125欧元)。

结论

腹腔镜腹疝修补术并发症发生率降低,平均住院时间缩短,总成本降低。腹腔镜修补术可为每位患者节省1260欧元,因此该手术应被视为一种具有成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.比较腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的成本效益分析
Cir Esp. 2014 Oct;92(8):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
2
The INCH-Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair.INCH试验:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较传统开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗切口疝的疗效。
BMC Surg. 2013 Jun 7;13:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-18.
3
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术:利用全州索赔数据进行的纵向结果及成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):906-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4310-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
4
Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study with costs analysis on 269 patients.腹腔镜与开放切口疝修补术:一项对269例患者进行成本分析的回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):609-618. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1601-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
The increased cost of ventral hernia recurrence: a cost analysis.腹疝复发成本的增加:一项成本分析。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1515-5. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States.美国目前腹前壁疝住院治疗的全国实践模式。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4104-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜与开放式切口疝修补术的随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):259-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466.
8
Closing the gap between the laparoscopic and open approaches to abdominal wall hernia repair: a trend and outcomes analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.缩小腹壁疝修补腹腔镜手术与开放手术方法之间的差距:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的趋势与结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3267-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4650-7. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
[Hybrid repair of postoperative ventral hernia].[术后腹疝的杂交修复术]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2018(4):24-30. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2018424-30.
10
Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample.腹腔镜与开放式疝修补术:全国住院患者样本的结果和社会人口统计学利用结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2432-z. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Groin Hernia Repair during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Romanian Nationwide Analysis.COVID-19 大流行期间的腹股沟疝修补术-罗马尼亚全国性分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 17;59(5):970. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050970.
2
Post-operative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, the impact of mesh soakage with bupivacaine solution versus normal saline solution: A randomised controlled trial (HAPPIEST Trial).腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛:布比卡因溶液与生理盐水溶液浸泡补片的效果比较:一项随机对照试验(HAPPIEST试验)
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):328-334. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_50_19.
3
Extraperitoneal laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: one step beyond.
经腹腹腔镜腹外疝修补术:更进一步。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):909-914. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01904-0. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
4
Umbilical hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis: A surgical challenge.肝硬化患者的脐疝:一项外科挑战。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jul 27;8(7):476-82. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i7.476.
5
The increased cost of ventral hernia recurrence: a cost analysis.腹疝复发成本的增加:一项成本分析。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1515-5. Epub 2016 Jun 27.