Molina J M, Baron A D, Edelman S V, Brechtel G, Wallace P, Olefsky J M
Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, La Jolla 92093.
Am J Physiol. 1990 Jan;258(1 Pt 1):E16-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.1.E16.
The single-compartment pool fraction model, when used with the hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique to measure rates of glucose turnover, sometimes underestimates true rates of glucose appearance (Ra) resulting in negative values for hepatic glucose output (HGO). We focused our attention on isotope discrimination and model error as possible explanations for this underestimation. We found no difference in [3-3H] glucose specific activity in samples obtained simultaneously from the femoral artery and vein (2,400 +/- 455 vs. 2,454 +/- 522 dpm/mg) in 6 men during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp study where insulin was infused at 40 mU.m-2.min-1 for 3 h; therefore, isotope discrimination did not occur. We compared the ability of a constant (0.6 microCi/min) vs. variable tracer infusion method (tracer added to the glucose infusate) to measure non-steady-state Ra during hyperinsulinemic clamp studies. Plasma specific activity fell during the constant tracer infusion studies but did not change from base line during the variable tracer infusion studies. By maintaining a constant plasma specific activity the variable tracer infusion method eliminates uncertainty about changes in glucose pool size. This overcame modeling error and more accurately measures non-steady-state Ra (P less than 0.001 by analysis of variance vs. constant infusion method). In conclusion, underestimation of Ra determined isotopically during hyperinsulinemic clamp studies is largely due to modeling error that can be overcome by use of the variable tracer infusion method. This method allows more accurate determination of Ra and HGO under non-steady-state conditions.
单室池分数模型与高胰岛素-正葡萄糖钳夹技术一起用于测量葡萄糖周转率时,有时会低估真正的葡萄糖出现率(Ra),导致肝葡萄糖输出(HGO)出现负值。我们将注意力集中在同位素歧视和模型误差上,将其作为这种低估的可能解释。在一项高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹研究中,对6名男性以40 mU·m⁻²·min⁻¹的速率输注胰岛素3小时,我们发现同时从股动脉和静脉采集的样本中[3-³H]葡萄糖比活没有差异(分别为2400±455与2454±522 dpm/mg);因此,未发生同位素歧视。我们比较了在高胰岛素钳夹研究期间,恒定(0.6微居里/分钟)与可变示踪剂输注方法(将示踪剂添加到葡萄糖输注液中)测量非稳态Ra的能力。在恒定示踪剂输注研究期间血浆比活下降,但在可变示踪剂输注研究期间与基线相比没有变化。通过维持恒定的血浆比活,可变示踪剂输注方法消除了葡萄糖池大小变化的不确定性。这克服了建模误差,更准确地测量非稳态Ra(方差分析显示与恒定输注方法相比P<0.001)。总之,在高胰岛素钳夹研究中通过同位素测定的Ra低估主要是由于建模误差,而使用可变示踪剂输注方法可以克服这一误差。该方法能够在非稳态条件下更准确地测定Ra和HGO。