Suppr超能文献

评估人类非稳态期间胰岛素作用起效和消退速率的方法。

Methods for assessment of the rate of onset and offset of insulin action during nonsteady state in humans.

作者信息

Butler P C, Caumo A, Zerman A, O'Brien P C, Cobelli C, Rizza R A

机构信息

Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1993 Apr;264(4 Pt 1):E548-60. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1993.264.4.E548.

Abstract

Measurement of glucose turnover under non-steady-state conditions has proven problematic. When the mass of the glucose pool is not changing (i.e., glucose concentrations are constant) non-steady-state error can be minimized if all glucose entering the circulation has the same specific activity as plasma [radioactive infused glucose (hot-GINF) method]. Alternatively, a second tracer can be used to measure the effective volume of glucose [variable-pV method of Issekutz (T. Issekutz, R. Issekutz, and D. Elahi. (Can. J. Physiol. 52:215-224, 1974)]. To determine whether these techniques provide concordant assessments of insulin action under non-steady-state conditions, glucose turnover was measured in six subjects. After initiation of insulin (0.6 mU.kg-1 x min-1), both methods indicated similar rates of suppression of hepatic glucose release, which was complete by approximately 100-120 min. In contrast, the traditional fixed-pV method of Steele (R. Steele, J. Wall, R. DeBodo, and N. Altszuler. Am. J. Physiol. 187:15-24 1956) underestimated turnover (P < 0.01) resulting in apparent complete suppression of glucose release within approximately 40 min (P < 0.01 vs. other methods). The hot-GINF and variable-pV methods also yielded similar estimates of turnover after discontinuation of insulin. Both indicated that resumption of hepatic glucose release was slower (P < 0.01) and fall of glucose uptake faster (P < 0.01) than suggested by the fixed-pV method. Thus both the hot-GINF and variable-pV methods avoid non-steady-state error introduced by the fixed-pV method and provide concordant assessments of the rate of onset and offset of insulin action.

摘要

在非稳态条件下测量葡萄糖周转率已被证明存在问题。当葡萄糖池的质量不变时(即葡萄糖浓度恒定),如果进入循环的所有葡萄糖具有与血浆相同的比活性[放射性输注葡萄糖(热 - GINF)法],非稳态误差可以最小化。或者,可以使用第二种示踪剂来测量葡萄糖的有效体积[伊塞库茨的可变 - pV法(T.伊塞库茨、R.伊塞库茨和D.埃拉希。(《加拿大生理学杂志》52:215 - 224,1974)]。为了确定这些技术在非稳态条件下是否能对胰岛素作用提供一致的评估,对6名受试者的葡萄糖周转率进行了测量。在开始输注胰岛素(0.6 mU·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)后,两种方法均显示肝葡萄糖释放的抑制率相似,在大约100 - 120分钟时完全抑制。相比之下,传统的斯蒂尔固定 - pV法(R.斯蒂尔、J.沃尔、R.德博多和N.阿尔茨祖勒。《美国生理学杂志》187:15 - 24,1956)低估了周转率(P < 0.01),导致在大约40分钟内葡萄糖释放明显完全抑制(与其他方法相比,P < 0.01)。在停止胰岛素输注后,热 - GINF法和可变 - pV法也得出了相似的周转率估计值。两者均表明,与固定 - pV法相比,肝葡萄糖释放的恢复较慢(P < 0.01),葡萄糖摄取的下降较快(P < 0.01)。因此,热 - GINF法和可变 - pV法都避免了固定 - pV法引入的非稳态误差,并对胰岛素作用的起效和消退速率提供了一致的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验