• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替罗非班维持时间对前壁心肌梗死心肌灌注缺损严重程度的影响。

Effects of tirofiban maintenance duration on myocardial perfusion defect severity in anterior myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey,

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2013 Sep;30(9):834-44. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0055-y. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-013-0055-y
PMID:24057341
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not often produce optimal results, despite restoration of coronary blood flow at myocardial recovery, because of impaired microvascular perfusion. This study aimed to investigate and evaluate with (99m)Tc-sestamibi scan whether the results of PCI can be changed by maintenance infusion of tirofiban for 24 or 48 h in patients presenting with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

The study included 84 patients with anterior STEMI who were candidates for primary PCI and whose occlusion was in the proximal or mid-left anterior descending artery. Patients were given 25 μg/kg/3 min tirofiban and randomized to receive maintenance infusion at 0.15 μg/kg/min for 24 or 48 h. A resting (99m)Tc sestamibi scan was performed on the 5th day post-procedure before discharge. The primary efficacy endpoint was a patient's score on a 5-point scoring system for perfusion defect severity. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death from any cause, re-infarction, and clinically driven target-vessel revascularization within the first 6 months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the patients were similar in the two infusion groups (n = 42 per group). There was no significant difference in the symptom onset-to-presentation time or door-to-balloon time between the two groups. With the exception of basal anteroseptal and basal anterior segments, significant reductions were obtained on the 5-point scoring system for perfusion defect severity in segments and in the summed rest scores. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of MACE at 6 months. The safety profile did not differ between 24 and 48 h infusions of tirofiban.

CONCLUSION

The use of tirofiban, when administered at a high bolus dose and maintained for 48 h, was safe and significantly reduced perfusion defect severity in patients with anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset and undergoing primary PCI.

摘要

简介

尽管在心肌恢复时恢复了冠状动脉血流,但经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)通常并不能产生理想的结果,因为微血管灌注受损。本研究旨在通过(99m)Tc-sestamibi 扫描,观察替罗非班维持输注 24 或 48 小时对前壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者 PCI 结果的影响。

方法

该研究纳入了 84 例前壁 STEMI 患者,这些患者为直接 PCI 候选者,且其闭塞部位位于左前降支近端或中段。患者接受 25μg/kg/3min 的替罗非班负荷量,随后随机接受 0.15μg/kg/min 的替罗非班维持输注,输注时间为 24 或 48 小时。患者于术后第 5 天(出院前)行静息(99m)Tc sestamibi 扫描。主要疗效终点为患者灌注缺损严重程度的 5 分评分系统评分。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为任何原因导致的死亡、再梗死和 6 个月内的临床驱动的靶血管血运重建。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似(每组 n=42)。两组间症状发作至就诊时间或门球时间无显著差异。除了基底前间隔和基底前壁节段外,灌注缺损严重程度的 5 分评分系统、节段和总和静息评分均有显著降低。两组患者在 6 个月时的 MACE 发生率无显著差异。替罗非班输注 24 或 48 小时的安全性无差异。

结论

在早期症状发作和接受直接 PCI 的前壁 STEMI 患者中,高负荷剂量替罗非班给药并维持 48 小时是安全的,可显著降低灌注缺损严重程度。

相似文献

1
Effects of tirofiban maintenance duration on myocardial perfusion defect severity in anterior myocardial infarction.替罗非班维持时间对前壁心肌梗死心肌灌注缺损严重程度的影响。
Adv Ther. 2013 Sep;30(9):834-44. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0055-y. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
2
Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班辅助治疗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床益处。
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f487e0.
3
Thrombus aspiration plus intra-infarct-related artery administration of tirofiban improves myocardial perfusion during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.血栓抽吸联合梗死相关动脉内替罗非班给药改善急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的心肌灌注。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Apr 5;123(7):877-83.
4
[Effect of tirofiban in acute anterior myocardial infarction patients without ST segment resolution after primary percutaneous coronary intervention].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;37(8):725-8.
5
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局:STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究)试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
6
[Clinical outcomes and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention combined with tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合替罗非班治疗的临床疗效及安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;35(11):1005-9.
7
Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial.替罗非班或阿昔单抗输注联合血管成形术与西罗莫司洗脱支架或未涂层支架植入术治疗急性心肌梗死的比较:MULTISTRATEGY随机试验
JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1788-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.joc80026. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
8
Intracoronary bolus-only compared with intravenous bolus plus infusion of tirofiban application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.冠状动脉内推注给药与静脉推注联合替罗非班输注在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):59-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23109. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison of prehospital tirofiban versus fibrinolysis before direct PCI.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):院前替罗非班与直接PCI前溶栓治疗的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 18;103(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.015.
10
Net clinical benefit of prehospital glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and high risk of bleeding: effect of tirofiban in patients at high risk of bleeding using CRUSADE bleeding score.院前糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂对ST段抬高型心肌梗死且出血风险高的患者的净临床获益:使用CRUSADE出血评分评估替罗非班对出血高风险患者的影响
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Mar;24(3):84-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracoronary administration of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention facilitates patients with acute coronary syndrome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉内注射替罗非班对急性冠状动脉综合征患者有益。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 12;8(63):107303-107311. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19179. eCollection 2017 Dec 5.
2
Effects of different routes of tirofiban injection on the left ventricular function and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班不同注射途径对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者左心室功能及预后的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jun;9(6):2401-2405. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2401. Epub 2015 Apr 1.