Wessex Neuroscience Centre, Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom ; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e74486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074486. eCollection 2013.
We studied the annual change in measures of motor, oculomotor and cognitive function in progressive supranuclear palsy. This had twin objectives, to assess the potential for clinical parameters to monitor disease progression in clinical trials and to illuminate the progression of pathophysiology.
Twenty three patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (Richardson's syndrome) were compared to 22 matched controls at baseline and 16 of these patients compared at baseline and one year using: the progressive supranuclear palsy rating scale; the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale; the revised Addenbrooke's cognitive examination; the frontal assessment battery; the cubes section of the visual object and space perception battery; the Hayling and Brixton executive tests; and saccadic latencies.
Patients were significantly impaired in all domains at baseline. However, cognitive performance was maintained over a year on the majority of tests. The unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, saccadic latency and progressive supranuclear palsy rating scale deteriorated over a year, with the latter showing the largest change. Power estimates indicate that using the progressive supranuclear palsy rating scale as an outcome measure in a clinical trial would require 45 patients per arm, to identify a 50% reduction in rate of decline with 80% power.
Motor, oculomotor and cognitive domains deteriorate at different rates in progressive supranuclear palsy. This may be due to differential degeneration of their respective cortical-subcortical circuits, and has major implications for the selection of outcome measures in clinical trials due to wide variation in sensitivity to annual rates of decline.
我们研究了进行性核上性麻痹患者运动、眼动和认知功能测量指标的年度变化。这有两个目的,一是评估临床参数在临床试验中监测疾病进展的潜力,二是阐明病理生理学的进展。
23 例进行性核上性麻痹患者(Richardson 综合征)与 22 例匹配对照者在基线时进行比较,其中 16 例患者在基线时和 1 年后进行比较,使用的方法包括:进行性核上性麻痹评定量表;统一帕金森病评定量表;修订版 Addenbrooke 认知测验;额叶评估量表;视觉物体和空间感知测验的方块部分;Hayling 和 Brixton 执行测试;以及扫视潜伏期。
患者在基线时所有领域均显著受损。然而,在大多数测试中,认知表现可在一年内保持。统一帕金森病评定量表、扫视潜伏期和进行性核上性麻痹评定量表在一年内恶化,其中后者变化最大。功效估计表明,使用进行性核上性麻痹评定量表作为临床试验的结局指标,需要每组 45 例患者,才能在 80%的功效下,识别出下降率降低 50%。
进行性核上性麻痹的运动、眼动和认知领域以不同的速度恶化。这可能是由于其各自的皮质-皮质下回路的变性不同所致,这对临床试验中结局指标的选择具有重大影响,因为其对年度下降率的敏感性差异很大。