• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海林测试和布里克斯顿测试在中老年成年人中检测痴呆、进行性认知衰退及轻度认知障碍的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness of the Hayling and Brixton Tests for Detecting Dementia, Progressive Cognitive Decline, and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle to Older Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Palombo M O, Foran A M

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6
PMID:40240733
Abstract

The aging population is increasing the prevalence of dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment, which are associated with cognitive declines in executive functioning. In people with these disorders, accurate tests can aid in the early detection of executive functioning decline and facilitate access to interventions. The Hayling and Brixton tests (HBTs) are popular executive functioning tests that assess inhibitory control. The HBTs may be especially effective for detecting people with disorders that are associated with disinhibition, such as behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). However, the effectiveness of the HBTs for detecting cognitive decline in dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment has yet to be collated. A comprehensive search of five databases identified 50 studies that compared the HBTs performances of adults aged 40 years and over with a dementia, neurodegenerative disorder, or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's dementia, bvFTD) and cognitively-healthy controls. Hedges' g effect sizes compared groups on the five HBTs scores (Inhibition Errors, Inhibition Reaction Time (RT), Automatic RT, Inhibition minus Automatic RT, and Brixton Errors). The disorders (combined) showed negative effects on all HBTs scores (g - 0.37 to - 1.13), with dementia (combined) performing the worst (g - 0.54 to - 1.56). Automatic RT and Inhibition Errors were the most effective scores for detecting cognitive decline in dementia (g - 1.55; g - 1.34). The dementia types performed similar after outliers were removed and only studies with low risk-of-bias were analyzed. Overall, the HBTs are effective for detecting cognitive decline in middle to older aged adults, especially those with dementia. However, no score type can be recommended for differentiating the dementia types, such as AD and bvFTD.

摘要

人口老龄化导致痴呆症、神经退行性疾病和轻度认知障碍的患病率不断上升,这些都与执行功能的认知衰退有关。在患有这些疾病的人群中,准确的测试有助于早期发现执行功能衰退,并便于获得干预措施。海林和布里克斯顿测试(HBTs)是常用的评估抑制控制能力的执行功能测试。HBTs对于检测与去抑制相关的疾病患者可能特别有效,如行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)。然而,HBTs在检测痴呆症、神经退行性疾病和轻度认知障碍中的认知衰退方面的有效性尚未得到整理。对五个数据库进行全面检索后,确定了50项研究,这些研究比较了40岁及以上患有痴呆症、神经退行性疾病或轻度认知障碍(如帕金森病、阿尔茨海默病性痴呆、bvFTD)的成年人与认知健康对照组的HBTs表现。通过赫奇斯g效应量比较了两组在五项HBTs分数上的差异(抑制错误、抑制反应时间(RT)、自动RT、抑制减去自动RT以及布里克斯顿错误)。这些疾病(综合起来)对所有HBTs分数都有负面影响(g值在-0.37至-1.13之间),痴呆症(综合起来)表现最差(g值在-0.54至-1.56之间)。自动RT和抑制错误是检测痴呆症认知衰退最有效的分数(g值分别为-1.55和-1.34)。去除异常值并仅分析低偏倚风险的研究后,不同类型的痴呆症表现相似。总体而言,HBTs对于检测中老年人尤其是痴呆症患者的认知衰退是有效的。然而,没有一种分数类型可用于区分不同类型的痴呆症,如阿尔茨海默病和bvFTD。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the Hayling and Brixton Tests for Detecting Dementia, Progressive Cognitive Decline, and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle to Older Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.海林测试和布里克斯顿测试在中老年成年人中检测痴呆、进行性认知衰退及轻度认知障碍的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6.
2
Effectiveness of sorting tests for detecting cognitive decline in older adults with dementia and other common neurodegenerative disorders: A meta-analysis.用于检测患有痴呆症和其他常见神经退行性疾病的老年人认知衰退的分类测试的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jan;120:442-454. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Longitudinal Executive Function and Episodic Memory Profiles in Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的纵向执行功能和情景记忆概况
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jan;23(1):34-43. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000837. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Inhibition impairment in frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease: clinical assessment and metabolic correlates.额颞叶痴呆、肌萎缩侧索硬化症和阿尔茨海默病的抑制障碍:临床评估和代谢相关性。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Jun;13(3):651-659. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9891-3.
5
Improved Accuracy of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised in the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Using Mokken Scale Analysis.基于莫克尺度分析的改良爱丁堡认知评估量表修订版在轻度认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆和行为变异型额颞叶痴呆诊断中的准确性提高。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(s1):S45-S55. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240554.
6
Distinct performance profiles on the Brixton test in frontotemporal dementia.在额颞叶痴呆中,布里斯顿测验表现出明显的不同。
J Neuropsychol. 2021 Jun;15(2):162-185. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12228. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Disinhibition in Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Neuropsychological and Behavioural Investigation.额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的去抑制:神经心理学和行为学研究。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Feb;26(2):163-171. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000973. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
Age and Semantic Inhibition Measured by the Hayling Task: A Meta-Analysis.通过海林任务测量的年龄与语义抑制:一项元分析。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):198-214. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw088.
9
Suitability of Goal Attainment Scaling in Older Adult Populations with Neurodegenerative Disease Experiencing Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.目标达成量表在认知障碍的老年神经退行性疾病患者中的适用性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gerontology. 2023;69(8):1002-1013. doi: 10.1159/000529984. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Combined Socio-Behavioral Evaluation Improves the Differential Diagnosis Between the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: In Search of Neuropsychological Markers.联合社会行为评估可提高行为变异型额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病的鉴别诊断:寻找神经心理学标志物。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(2):761-772. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170650.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive dysfunction in animal models of human lewy-body dementia.人类路易体痴呆动物模型中的认知功能障碍。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jul 22;16:1369733. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1369733. eCollection 2024.
2
The relation between cognitive functioning and activities of daily living in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: a meta-analysis.认知功能与日常生活活动在正常衰老、轻度认知障碍和痴呆中的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2427-2443. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07366-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
3
Young-onset dementia diagnosis, management and care: a narrative review.
早发性痴呆诊断、管理和护理:叙述性评论。
Med J Aust. 2023 Mar 6;218(4):182-189. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51849. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
4
Executive functions in primary progressive aphasia: A meta-analysis.原发性进行性失语症中的执行功能:一项荟萃分析。
Cortex. 2022 Dec;157:304-322. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
5
Mortality rates in Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿尔茨海默病和非阿尔茨海默痴呆症的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Aug;2(8):e479-e488. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00140-9. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
Proposed research criteria for prodromal behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.前驱期行为变异额颞叶痴呆的研究标准草案。
Brain. 2022 Apr 29;145(3):1079-1097. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab365.
7
A Review of the Common Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Therapeutic Approaches and the Potential Role of Nanotherapeutics.常见神经退行性疾病综述:当前治疗方法及纳米疗法的潜在作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 6;23(3):1851. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031851.
8
Executive Dysfunction and the Prefrontal Cortex.执行功能障碍与前额叶皮层。
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2021 Dec 1;27(6):1586-1601. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001009.
9
The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function.前额皮质在认知控制和执行功能中的作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):72-89. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
What Do We Mean by Behavioral Disinhibition in Frontotemporal Dementia?我们所说的额颞叶痴呆中的行为脱抑制是什么意思?
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 7;12:707799. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.707799. eCollection 2021.