Laboratory of Hemostasis, Division of Hematology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Oct;34(10):534-48. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Most native proteins do not make optimal drugs and thus a second- and third-generation of therapeutic proteins, which have been engineered to improve product attributes or to enhance process characteristics, are rapidly becoming the norm. There has been unprecedented progress, during the past decade, in the development of platform technologies that further these ends. Although the advantages of engineered therapeutic proteins are considerable, the alterations can affect the safety and efficacy of the drugs. We discuss both the key technological innovations with respect to engineered therapeutic proteins and advancements in the underlying basic science. The latter would permit the design of science-based criteria for the prediction and assessment of potential risks and the development of appropriate risk management plans. This in turn holds promise for more predictable criteria for the licensure of a class of products that are extremely challenging to develop but represent an increasingly important component of modern medical practice.
大多数天然蛋白质并非理想的药物,因此经过工程改造以改善产品属性或增强工艺特性的第二代和第三代治疗性蛋白质正迅速成为常规。在过去十年中,在进一步实现这些目标的平台技术的开发方面取得了前所未有的进展。尽管工程改造的治疗性蛋白质具有相当大的优势,但这些改变可能会影响药物的安全性和有效性。我们讨论了与工程改造的治疗性蛋白质相关的关键技术创新以及基础科学的进展。后者将允许设计基于科学的标准,以预测和评估潜在风险,并制定适当的风险管理计划。这反过来又为一类极难开发但代表现代医学实践中越来越重要的组成部分的产品的许可提供了更具可预测性的标准提供了希望。