General Surgery, St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Italy.
Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;22(4):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
Robotic surgery might have several advantages in respect of the laparoscopic approach since might make more feasible the execution of a complex procedure such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the current state of the literature on robotic PD.
A systematic literature search was performed, from January 1st 2003 to July 31st 2012, for studies which reported PDs performed for neoplasm and in which at least one surgical reconstructive or resective step was robotically performed.
Thirteen studies, representing 207 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The definition of the robotic approach was heterogeneous since the technique was defined as robotic, robotic-assisted, robot-assisted laparoscopic and robotic hybrid. Resection and reconstruction steps of robotic PD were also heterogeneous combining sequentially different approaches: totally robotic technique, laparoscopic-robotic resection and robotic reconstruction, laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, hand port-assisted laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, laparoscopic-robotic resection and reconstruction through mini-laparotomy. As regard the type of PD 66% were classic Whipple operations and 34% pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies. The management of pancreatic stump was a pancreaticogastrostomy in 23%, end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy in 67%, and fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in 10% of cases. The overall procedure failure (rates of conversion to open surgery) was 14%. The overall morbidity rate was 58% and the reoperation rate was 7.3%.
There have been an increasing number of recent case series suggesting increased utilization of robotic PD over the past decade. The technical approach is heterogenous. For highly selected patient, robotic PD is feasible with similar morbidity and mortality compared to open or purely laparoscopic approaches. Data on cost analysis are lacking and further studies are needed to evaluate also the cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach for PD in comparison to open or laparoscopic techniques. The current state of the art analysis on robotic DP can be also useful in planning future trials.
与腹腔镜方法相比,机器人手术可能具有一些优势,因为它可能使胰腺十二指肠切除术 (PD) 等复杂手术变得更加可行。本系统评价的目的是评估目前关于机器人 PD 的文献现状。
从 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 7 月 31 日,对报道为肿瘤而行 PD 且至少有一个手术重建或切除步骤采用机器人完成的研究进行了系统的文献检索。
符合纳入标准的研究有 13 项,共 207 例患者。机器人手术方法的定义存在异质性,因为该技术被定义为机器人、机器人辅助、机器人辅助腹腔镜和机器人混合。机器人 PD 的切除和重建步骤也存在异质性,结合了不同的方法:全机器人技术、腹腔镜-机器人切除和机器人重建、腹腔镜切除和机器人重建、手端口辅助腹腔镜切除和机器人重建、腹腔镜-机器人切除和通过小切口重建。至于 PD 的类型,66%是经典的 Whipple 手术,34%是保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术。胰腺残端的处理方式是胰胃吻合术(23%)、胰肠端侧吻合术(67%)和主胰管纤维蛋白胶封堵术(10%)。整个手术失败率(转为开腹手术的比例)为 14%。总发病率为 58%,再次手术率为 7.3%。
在过去十年中,越来越多的病例系列研究表明,机器人 PD 的应用越来越多。技术方法具有异质性。对于高度选择的患者,与开腹或单纯腹腔镜方法相比,机器人 PD 是可行的,且具有相似的发病率和死亡率。缺乏成本分析数据,需要进一步研究来评估机器人 PD 与开腹或腹腔镜技术相比的成本效益。目前对机器人 DP 的技术分析也有助于规划未来的试验。