Cabanelas Nuno, Vidigal Ferreira Maria João, Donato Paulo, Gaspar António, Pinto Joana, Caseiro-Alves Filipe, Providência Luís Augusto
Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santarém, Santarém, Portugal.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2013 Oct;32(10):785-91. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2012.10.020. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is increasingly important in the diagnostic work-up of a wide range of heart diseases, including those with arrhythmogenic potential.
To assess the added value of CMR in etiological diagnosis of ventricular arrhythmias after an inconclusive conventional investigation.
Patients undergoing CMR between 2005 and 2011 for investigation of ventricular arrhythmias were included (n=113). All had documented arrhythmias. Those with a definite diagnosis from a previous investigation and those with evidence of coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndrome, typical angina symptoms, increase in biomarkers or positive stress test) were excluded. CMR results were considered relevant when they fulfilled diagnostic criteria.
Of the 113 patients, 57.5% were male and mean age was 41.7 ± 16.2 years. Regarding the initial arrhythmia, 38.1% had ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) and 61.9% had less complex ventricular ectopy. CMR imaging showed criteria of a specific diagnosis in 42.5% of patients, was totally normal in 36.3%, and showed non-specific alterations in the remainder. In VF/VT patients, specific criteria were found in 60.4%, and in 31.4% of those with less complex ectopy. The most frequent diagnoses were arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, ventricular non-compaction and myopericarditis. It is worth noting that, although there was no evidence of previous coronary artery disease, 6.2% of patients had a late gadolinium enhancement distribution pattern compatible with myocardial infarction.
CMR gives additional and important information in the diagnostic work-up of ventricular arrhythmias after an inconclusive initial investigation. The proportion of patients with diagnostic criteria was 42.5% (60.0% in those with VF/VT), and CMR was completely normal in 36.6%.
心脏磁共振成像(CMR)在多种心脏病的诊断检查中愈发重要,包括那些具有致心律失常潜力的疾病。
评估在传统检查未得出明确结论后,CMR在室性心律失常病因诊断中的附加价值。
纳入2005年至2011年间因室性心律失常接受CMR检查的患者(n = 113)。所有患者均有记录在案的心律失常。排除先前检查已明确诊断的患者以及有冠状动脉疾病证据(急性冠状动脉综合征、典型心绞痛症状、生物标志物升高或负荷试验阳性)的患者。当CMR结果符合诊断标准时,则视为相关结果。
113例患者中,57.5%为男性,平均年龄为41.7±16.2岁。关于初始心律失常,38.1%为心室颤动/持续性室性心动过速(VF/VT),61.9%为复杂性较低的室性早搏。CMR成像显示42.5%的患者有特定诊断标准,36.3%完全正常,其余患者显示非特异性改变。在VF/VT患者中,60.4%发现有特定标准,在复杂性较低的室性早搏患者中这一比例为31.4%。最常见的诊断为致心律失常性右心室发育不良、心室肌致密化不全和心肌心包炎。值得注意的是,尽管没有先前冠状动脉疾病的证据,但6.2%的患者有与心肌梗死相符的延迟钆增强分布模式。
在初始检查未得出明确结论后,CMR在室性心律失常的诊断检查中提供了额外的重要信息。符合诊断标准的患者比例为42.5%(VF/VT患者中为60.0%),CMR完全正常的比例为36.6%。