Melcher Tobias, Wolter Sarah, Falck Stefanie, Wild Eva, Wild Florian, Gruber Eva, Falkai Peter, Gruber Oliver
Centre for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Georg August University Göttingen, von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Göttingen, Germany,
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;264(6):517-32. doi: 10.1007/s00406-013-0445-9. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder broadly overlap in multiple areas involving clinical phenomenology, genetics, and neurobiology. Still, the investigation into specific elementary (sub-)processes of executive functioning may help to define clear points of distinction between these categorical diagnoses to validate the nosological dichotomy and, indirectly, to further elucidate their pathophysiological underpinnings. In the present behavioral study, we sought to separate common from diagnosis-specific deficits in a series of specific elementary sub-functions of executive processing in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. For our purpose, we administered a modern and multi-purpose neuropsychological task paradigm to equal-sized and matched groups of schizophrenia patients, patients with bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects. First, schizophrenia patients compared to the bipolar group exhibited a more pronounced deficit in general measures of task performance comprising both response speed and accuracy. Additionally, bipolar patients showed increased advance task preparation, i.e., were better able to compensate for response speed deficits when longer preparation intervals were provided. Set-shifting, on the other hand, was impaired to a similar degree in both patient groups. Finally, schizophrenia patients exhibited a specific deficit in conflict processing (inhibitory control) and the shielding of task-relevant processing from distraction (i.e., attentional maintenance). The present investigation suggests that specific neuropsychological measures of elementary executive functions may represent important points of dissociation between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, which may help to differentiate the pathophysiological underpinnings of these major psychiatric disorders. In this context, the present findings highlight the measures of inhibitory control and attentional maintenance as promising candidates.
精神分裂症和双相情感障碍在涉及临床现象学、遗传学和神经生物学的多个领域广泛重叠。尽管如此,对执行功能的特定基本(子)过程进行研究,可能有助于明确这些分类诊断之间的明显区别,以验证疾病分类二分法,并间接地进一步阐明其病理生理基础。在本行为研究中,我们试图在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者执行加工的一系列特定基本子功能中,区分共同缺陷和诊断特异性缺陷。为此,我们对精神分裂症患者、双相情感障碍患者和健康对照受试者的同等规模且匹配的组实施了一种现代且多功能的神经心理学任务范式。首先,与双相情感障碍组相比,精神分裂症患者在包括反应速度和准确性的任务表现总体测量中表现出更明显的缺陷。此外,双相情感障碍患者表现出更多的任务提前准备,即当提供更长的准备间隔时,他们更能补偿反应速度缺陷。另一方面,两组患者的定势转换受损程度相似。最后,精神分裂症患者在冲突处理(抑制控制)以及将与任务相关的加工从干扰中屏蔽(即注意力维持)方面表现出特定缺陷。本研究表明,基本执行功能的特定神经心理学测量可能代表精神分裂症和双相情感障碍之间的重要区分点,这可能有助于区分这些主要精神疾病的病理生理基础。在这种背景下,本研究结果突出了抑制控制和注意力维持测量作为有前景的候选指标。