Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA,
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):161-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1163-y. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Use of adhesives for mesh fixation in hernia is increasing. There has been minimal study of mesh incorporation and interface strength with adhesive fixation for ventral hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fixation properties of fibrin glue as it compared to suture fixation of mesh in an onlay position.
Twenty-four mongrel pigs were divided into three study arms based on time points for biomechanical evaluation: 24 h (n = 8), 7 days (n = 8), and 14 days (n = 8). Initial procedures included placement of two 4 × 6 cm pieces of wide-pore polypropylene mesh in an onlay position. One was fixated with 4 ml of fibrin glue and the other with four interrupted 2-0 polypropylene sutures. The shear strength of fixation was evaluated using a uniaxial testing device along with histological evaluation. Maximum force was normalized by the width of the mesh.
Mesh-tissue interface of glued and sutured specimens at 7 and 14 days did not fail in our testing configuration. Only at the 24-h time point the mesh detached from the tissue, and the sutured interface (10.4 N/cm) was significantly stronger than glued interface (4.9 N/cm, p = 0.004). Histopathologic and gross evaluations of the specimens revealed similar histologic features at all time points for both glued and sutured specimens.
With mesh in the onlay position, fixation to the abdominal wall occurs quickly. Though sutures were stronger at 24 h, as early as 1 week, the strength of the fixation exceeded the tissue or the mesh strength in our testing configuration for both glue and suture groups. Fixation strength is independent of technique at the latter time points. There are potential clinical advantages to the exclusive use of fibrin glue for fixation including acute post-operative pain, chronic post-operative pain, and recurrence for ventral incisional hernia repair.
在疝修补术中使用黏合剂固定网片的情况越来越多。然而,对于腹外疝修补术中黏合剂固定网片的植入和界面强度的研究却很少。本研究旨在评估纤维蛋白胶的固定性能,并将其与网片的覆盖式位置的缝线固定进行比较。
24 只杂种猪根据生物力学评估的时间点分为三组研究:24 小时(n=8)、7 天(n=8)和 14 天(n=8)。初始手术包括将两块 4×6cm 的宽孔聚丙烯网片以覆盖式位置放置。其中一块用 4ml 纤维蛋白胶固定,另一块用 4 根间断的 2-0 聚丙烯缝线固定。使用单轴测试装置和组织学评估来评估固定的剪切强度。最大力通过网片的宽度进行归一化。
在我们的测试配置中,黏合和缝合标本的网片-组织界面在 7 天和 14 天均未失效。只有在 24 小时时间点,网片才从组织上脱落,缝合界面(10.4N/cm)明显强于黏合界面(4.9N/cm,p=0.004)。对标本的组织病理学和大体评估显示,在所有时间点,黏合和缝合标本均具有相似的组织学特征。
对于覆盖式位置的网片,与腹壁的固定很快发生。尽管在 24 小时时缝线更强,但在 1 周时,在我们的测试配置中,固定的强度超过了组织或网片的强度,无论是黏合组还是缝线组都是如此。在后期时间点,固定强度与技术无关。对于腹侧切口疝修补术,仅使用纤维蛋白胶固定具有潜在的临床优势,包括急性术后疼痛、慢性术后疼痛和复发。