Suppr超能文献

新型生物黏附涂层固定网片与钉固定修补 IPOM 疝:在猪模型中的体内评估。

Mesh fixation using novel bio-adhesive coating compared to tack fixation for IPOM hernia repair: in vivo evaluation in a porcine model.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, 70300, Israel.

Toxicologic Pathology, Timrat and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2364-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06806-x. Epub 2019 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesh fixation in hernia repair is currently based on penetrating sutures or anchors, with proven early and late complications such as pain, adhesions, erosions, and anchor migration. In an attempt to reduce these complications, a bio-adhesive-based self-fixation system was developed. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of this novel self-adhesive mesh (LifeMesh™) by comparing it with standard tack fixation.

METHODS

A full-thickness abdominal wall defect was created bilaterally in 24 pigs. The defects were measured 14 days later, and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repairs were performed. In each animal, both LifeMesh and a titanium tack-fixed control, either uncoated polypropylene mesh (PP) or composite mesh (Symbotex™), were used. After 28 and 90 days, we performed macroscopic evaluation and analyzed the fixation strength, shrinkage, adhesion scores, and histopathology in all samples.

RESULTS

Measurements at both time points revealed that LifeMesh had fully conformed to the abdominal wall, and that its fixation strength was superior to that of the tack-fixated Symbotex and comparable to that of the tack-fixated PP. Shrinkage in all groups was similar. Adhesion scores with LifeMesh were lower than with PP and comparable with Symbotex at both time points. Histology demonstrated similar tissue responses in LifeMesh and Symbotex. Lack of necrosis, mineralization, or exuberant inflammatory reaction in all three groups pointed to their good progressive integration of the mesh to the abdominal wall. By 28 days the bio-adhesive layer in LifeMesh was substantially degraded, allowing a gradual tissue ingrowth that became the main fixation mode of this mesh to the abdominal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent incorporation of LifeMesh to the abdominal wall and its superior fixation strength, together with its low adhesion score, suggest that LifeMesh may become a preferred alternative for abdominal wall repair.

摘要

背景

目前,疝修补术中的网片固定方法是基于穿透缝线或锚钉,这些方法存在疼痛、粘连、侵蚀和锚钉迁移等早期和晚期并发症。为了减少这些并发症,开发了一种基于生物粘合剂的自固定系统。本研究旨在通过与标准缝合固定进行比较,评估这种新型自粘网片(LifeMesh)的性能和安全性。

方法

在 24 头猪的双侧腹壁上造成全层腹壁缺损。14 天后测量这些缺损,并进行腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)。在每只动物中,都使用了 LifeMesh 以及未经处理的聚丙稀网片(PP)或复合网片(Symbotex)的钛钉固定对照组。在 28 天和 90 天后,我们对所有样本进行了宏观评估,并分析了固定强度、收缩、粘连评分和组织病理学。

结果

在两个时间点的测量结果表明,LifeMesh 完全符合腹壁,其固定强度优于钛钉固定的 Symbotex,与钛钉固定的 PP 相当。所有组的收缩情况相似。在两个时间点,LifeMesh 的粘连评分均低于 PP,与 Symbotex 相当。组织学显示 LifeMesh 和 Symbotex 具有相似的组织反应。所有三组均未见坏死、矿化或过度炎症反应,表明网片与腹壁的良好渐进性整合。在 28 天时,LifeMesh 的生物粘合剂层已基本降解,允许逐渐的组织向内生长,成为该网片与腹壁的主要固定方式。

结论

LifeMesh 与腹壁的良好结合以及其优异的固定强度,加上其较低的粘连评分,表明它可能成为腹壁修复的首选替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验