• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别异质人群中的亚群标志物。

Identifying subgroup markers in heterogeneous populations.

机构信息

Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Division of Molecular Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Nov;41(21):e200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt845. Epub 2013 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1093/nar/gkt845
PMID:24062158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3834840/
Abstract

Traditional methods that aim to identify biomarkers that distinguish between two groups, like Significance Analysis of Microarrays or the t-test, perform optimally when such biomarkers show homogeneous behavior within each group and differential behavior between the groups. However, in many applications, this is not the case. Instead, a subgroup of samples in one group shows differential behavior with respect to all other samples. To successfully detect markers showing such imbalanced patterns of differential signal, a different approach is required. We propose a novel method, specifically designed for the Detection of Imbalanced Differential Signal (DIDS). We use an artificial dataset and a human breast cancer dataset to measure its performance and compare it with three traditional methods and four approaches that take imbalanced signal into account. Supported by extensive experimental results, we show that DIDS outperforms all other approaches in terms of power and positive predictive value. In a mouse breast cancer dataset, DIDS is the only approach that detects a functionally validated marker of chemotherapy resistance. DIDS can be applied to any continuous value data, including gene expression data, and in any context where imbalanced differential signal is manifested.

摘要

传统方法旨在识别能够区分两组的生物标志物,如 Significance Analysis of Microarrays 或 t 检验,当这些生物标志物在每组内表现出均匀的行为且在组间表现出差异行为时,其性能最佳。然而,在许多应用中,情况并非如此。相反,一组中的一个亚组样本相对于所有其他样本表现出差异行为。为了成功检测显示这种不平衡差异信号的标志物,需要采用不同的方法。我们提出了一种新方法,专门用于检测不平衡差异信号 (DIDS)。我们使用人工数据集和人类乳腺癌数据集来衡量其性能,并将其与三种传统方法和四种考虑不平衡信号的方法进行比较。实验结果表明,DIDS 在功效和阳性预测值方面均优于其他所有方法。在一个小鼠乳腺癌数据集上,DIDS 是唯一检测到化疗耐药的功能验证标志物的方法。DIDS 可应用于任何连续值数据,包括基因表达数据,以及在表现出不平衡差异信号的任何情况下。

相似文献

1
Identifying subgroup markers in heterogeneous populations.识别异质人群中的亚群标志物。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Nov;41(21):e200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt845. Epub 2013 Sep 22.
2
SERPINA6, BEX1, AGTR1, SLC26A3, and LAPTM4B are markers of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂 A6、BEX1、血管紧张素受体 1、溶质载体家族 26 成员 3 和 LAPTM4B 是曲妥珠单抗联合化疗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗耐药的标志物。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan;137(1):213-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2340-x. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
3
Prolactin-induced mouse mammary carcinomas model estrogen resistant luminal breast cancer.催乳素诱导的小鼠乳腺肿瘤模型模拟了雌激素抵抗型腔面乳腺肿瘤。
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Jan 28;13(1):R11. doi: 10.1186/bcr2819.
4
Impact of intertumoral heterogeneity on predicting chemotherapy response of BRCA1-deficient mammary tumors.肿瘤间异质性对预测 BRCA1 缺陷型乳腺肿瘤化疗反应的影响。
Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;72(9):2350-61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-4201. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Aging impacts transcriptomes but not genomes of hormone-dependent breast cancers.衰老影响激素依赖性乳腺癌的转录组,但不影响其基因组。
Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(5):R59. doi: 10.1186/bcr1765.
6
Proteomic profiling of triple-negative breast carcinomas in combination with a three-tier orthogonal technology approach identifies Mage-A4 as potential therapeutic target in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.三重阴性乳腺癌的蛋白质组学分析结合三层正交技术方法鉴定 Mage-A4 作为雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌的潜在治疗靶点。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Feb;12(2):381-94. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.019786. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
Predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to the phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase inhibitor GDC-0941 in breast cancer preclinical models.预测乳腺癌临床前模型对磷脂酰肌醇 3-激酶抑制剂 GDC-0941 敏感性的生物标志物。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jul 15;16(14):3670-83. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2828. Epub 2010 May 7.
8
Relative Prognostic and Predictive Value of Gene Signature and Histologic Grade in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.基因特征与组织学分级在雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌中的相对预后及预测价值
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Apr;16(2):95-100.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
An H3K4me3 reader, BAP18 as an adaptor of COMPASS-like core subunits co-activates ERα action and associates with the sensitivity of antiestrogen in breast cancer.一种 H3K4me3 阅读器,BAP18 作为 COMPASS 样核心亚基的接头,共同激活 ERα 作用,并与乳腺癌中抗雌激素的敏感性相关。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Nov 4;48(19):10768-10784. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa787.
10
Ratio of proliferation markers and HSP90 gene expression as a predictor of pathological complete response in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.增殖标志物与HSP90基因表达的比值作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗中病理完全缓解的预测指标
Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2016;54(4):202-209. doi: 10.5603/FHC.a2016.0026. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity-preserving discriminative feature selection for disease-specific subtype discovery.用于疾病特异性亚型发现的保持异质性的判别特征选择
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 16;16(1):3593. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58718-1.
2
scCTS: identifying the cell type-specific marker genes from population-level single-cell RNA-seq.scCTS:从群体水平的单细胞 RNA-seq 中识别细胞类型特异性标记基因。
Genome Biol. 2024 Oct 14;25(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03410-8.
3
H2AX promotes replication fork degradation and chemosensitivity in BRCA-deficient tumours.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach.采用组织微阵列方法测定乳腺癌 HER2 检测的敏感性和特异性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 13;14(3):R93. doi: 10.1186/bcr3208.
2
Evolution of antibiotic resistance at non-lethal drug concentrations.非致死药物浓度下抗生素耐药性的演变。
Drug Resist Updat. 2012 Jun;15(3):162-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
3
Impact of intertumoral heterogeneity on predicting chemotherapy response of BRCA1-deficient mammary tumors.
H2AX 促进 BRCA 缺陷型肿瘤中复制叉的降解和化学敏感性。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 24;15(1):4430. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48715-1.
4
KaMRaT: a C++ toolkit for k-mer count matrix dimension reduction.KaMRaT:一种用于 k-mer 计数矩阵降维的 C++工具包。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Mar 4;40(3). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae090.
5
Heterogeneity-Preserving Discriminative Feature Selection for Disease-Specific Subtype Discovery.用于疾病特异性亚型发现的保持异质性的判别特征选择
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 5:2023.05.14.540686. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.14.540686.
6
The inhibitory effect of trastuzumab on BT474 triple‑positive breast cancer cell viability is reversed by the combination of progesterone and estradiol.曲妥珠单抗对BT474三阳性乳腺癌细胞活力的抑制作用被孕酮和雌二醇的联合使用所逆转。
Oncol Lett. 2023 Nov 15;27(1):19. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14152. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Multi-omics analysis reveals distinct non-reversion mechanisms of PARPi resistance in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-deficient mammary tumors.多组学分析揭示了 BRCA1 缺陷型与 BRCA2 缺陷型乳腺肿瘤中 PARPi 耐药的不同非逆转机制。
Cell Rep. 2023 May 30;42(5):112538. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112538. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
A living biobank of patient-derived ductal carcinoma in situ mouse-intraductal xenografts identifies risk factors for invasive progression.患者源性原位导管癌小鼠原位异种移植活体生物库鉴定浸润进展的风险因素。
Cancer Cell. 2023 May 8;41(5):986-1002.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
9
STARD3: A New Biomarker in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.STARD3:人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌中的一种新型生物标志物。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;15(2):362. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020362.
10
Reference-free transcriptome signatures for prostate cancer prognosis.无参考转录组特征用于前列腺癌预后。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08021-1.
肿瘤间异质性对预测 BRCA1 缺陷型乳腺肿瘤化疗反应的影响。
Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;72(9):2350-61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-4201. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
4
Genomics and cancer drug resistance.基因组学与癌症药物耐药性。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;13(5):651-73. doi: 10.2174/138920112799857549.
5
Do predictive signatures really predict response to cancer chemotherapy?预测标志物真能预测癌症化疗的反应吗?
Cell Cycle. 2010 Dec 15;9(24):4836-40. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.24.14326.
6
Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors.训练样本量和分类难度对基因组预测器准确性的影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(1):R5. doi: 10.1186/bcr2468. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
7
Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.术前化疗反应背景下的临床和分子乳腺癌亚型的一致性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jan;119(1):119-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0499-6. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
8
Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists.生物信息学富集工具:通向大型基因列表全面功能分析的途径
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
MOST: detecting cancer differential gene expression.MOST:检测癌症差异基因表达。
Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):411-8. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm042. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
10
Cancer outlier differential gene expression detection.癌症异常差异基因表达检测
Biostatistics. 2007 Jul;8(3):566-75. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl029. Epub 2006 Oct 4.