Ayal A. Aizer, Harvard Radiation Oncology Program; Ellen P. McCarthy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Mallika L. Mendu, Sophia Koo, Powell L. Graham, Neil E. Martin, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; Tyler J. Wilhite, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Ming-Hui Chen, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3869-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
To examine the impact of marital status on stage at diagnosis, use of definitive therapy, and cancer-specific mortality among each of the 10 leading causes of cancer-related death in the United States.
We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program to identify 1,260,898 patients diagnosed in 2004 through 2008 with lung, colorectal, breast, pancreatic, prostate, liver/intrahepatic bile duct, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, head/neck, ovarian, or esophageal cancer. We used multivariable logistic and Cox regression to analyze the 734,889 patients who had clinical and follow-up information available.
Married patients were less likely to present with metastatic disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.84; P < .001), more likely to receive definitive therapy (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.51 to 1.56; P < .001), and less likely to die as a result of their cancer after adjusting for demographics, stage, and treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.81; P < .001) than unmarried patients. These associations remained significant when each individual cancer was analyzed (P < .05 for all end points for each malignancy). The benefit associated with marriage was greater in males than females for all outcome measures analyzed (P < .001 in all cases). For prostate, breast, colorectal, esophageal, and head/neck cancers, the survival benefit associated with marriage was larger than the published survival benefit of chemotherapy.
Even after adjusting for known confounders, unmarried patients are at significantly higher risk of presentation with metastatic cancer, undertreatment, and death resulting from their cancer. This study highlights the potentially significant impact that social support can have on cancer detection, treatment, and survival.
在美国十大癌症相关死因中,每一种死因,均探讨婚姻状况对诊断时的分期、确定性治疗的应用以及癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results,SEER)程序,确定了 2004 年至 2008 年间诊断为肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、肝/肝内胆管癌、非霍奇金淋巴瘤、头颈部癌、卵巢癌或食管癌的 1260898 名患者。我们使用多变量逻辑和 Cox 回归分析了 734889 名具有临床和随访信息的患者。
已婚患者更有可能表现为非转移性疾病(调整后的比值比 [OR],0.83;95%CI,0.82 至 0.84;P<.001),更有可能接受确定性治疗(调整后的 OR,1.53;95%CI,1.51 至 1.56;P<.001),并且在调整了人口统计学、分期和治疗因素后,死于癌症的风险更低(调整后的风险比 [HR],0.80;95%CI,0.79 至 0.81;P<.001),而未婚患者则不是。当分析每个单独的癌症时,这些关联仍然显著(所有恶性肿瘤的所有终点 P<.05)。对于所有分析的结局指标,婚姻带来的益处在男性中大于女性(所有情况下 P<.001)。对于前列腺癌、乳腺癌、结直肠癌、食管癌和头颈部癌,与婚姻相关的生存获益大于已发表的化疗生存获益。
即使在调整了已知混杂因素后,未婚患者在表现为转移性癌症、治疗不足以及因癌症而死亡的风险仍然显著更高。本研究强调了社会支持对癌症检测、治疗和生存可能产生的重大影响。