Suppr超能文献

采用标准化链格孢菌提取物进行双盲、安慰剂对照的快速免疫疗法。

Double-blind, placebo-controlled rush immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract.

作者信息

Horst M, Hejjaoui A, Horst V, Michel F B, Bousquet J

机构信息

Clinique des Maladies Respiratoires, Hopital l'Aiguelongue, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990 Feb;85(2):460-72. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(90)90156-x.

Abstract

Specific immunotherapy is ineffective with unstandardized mold extracts. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 24 patients (5 to 56 years of age) only allergic to Alternaria. The extract was standardized by isoelectric focusing, crossed immunoelectrophoresis, crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis, RAST inhibition, and skin tests and contained allergen Alternaria major allergen a I and antigen B. Thirteen patients received the active treatment, and 11 received the placebo. Immunotherapy was started by a 2-day rush protocol; maintenance injections were administered for 1 year. The patient's self-evaluation of the treatment was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in the placebo-treated group. Global symptom-medication scores, including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis, were significantly (p less than 0.005) lower in the actively treated group. Nasal challenges with Alternaria extract were performed before immunotherapy and after 1 year of treatment. There was no difference in the placebo-treated group and a significantly (p less than 0.01) increased mean provocative dose in the actively treated group. Skin tests were significantly reduced in the actively treated group. Specific IgG increased significantly in the actively treated group and were stable in the placebo-treated group. There was a significant correlation between nasal challenges and nasal symptom-medication scores (p less than 0.03) or the patient's self-evaluation of efficacy (p less than 0.05). This study demonstrated that patients only sensitized to Alternaria benefit from specific immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract.

摘要

使用未标准化的霉菌提取物进行特异性免疫疗法无效。对24名仅对链格孢属过敏的患者(年龄在5至56岁之间)进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。提取物通过等电聚焦、交叉免疫电泳、交叉放射免疫电泳、RAST抑制和皮肤试验进行标准化,包含变应原链格孢主要变应原a I和抗原B。13名患者接受了积极治疗,11名患者接受了安慰剂治疗。免疫疗法通过为期2天的快速方案开始;维持注射进行了1年。安慰剂治疗组患者对治疗的自我评估显著更低(p小于0.001)。包括哮喘和鼻结膜炎在内的总体症状-用药评分,积极治疗组显著更低(p小于0.005)。在免疫疗法前和治疗1年后用链格孢提取物进行鼻腔激发试验。安慰剂治疗组没有差异,积极治疗组平均激发剂量显著增加(p小于0.01)。积极治疗组的皮肤试验显著降低。积极治疗组特异性IgG显著增加,安慰剂治疗组则保持稳定。鼻腔激发试验与鼻腔症状-用药评分(p小于0.03)或患者对疗效的自我评估(p小于0.05)之间存在显著相关性。这项研究表明,仅对链格孢致敏的患者从使用标准化链格孢提取物的特异性免疫疗法中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验