• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子方法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的应用:最新进展。

Molecular methods in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: an update.

机构信息

Institut de Microbiologie, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;13(7):681-92. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2013.829705.

DOI:10.1586/14737159.2013.829705
PMID:24063396
Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) represent a major advance in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection. This review analyzes the different options available for a molecular diagnosis of C. difficile infection, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of NAATs. The performances of seven commercials NAATs are compared (BD GeneOhm Cdiff, Illumigene C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile, BD Max Cdiff, Portrait Toxigenic C. difficile, ProGastro Cd, Seeplex Diarrhea ACE). The sensitivity and the rapidity of NAATs are excellent: additional efforts should focus on the discrimination between infection and colonization. Reporting the DNA load of toxigenic C. difficile in the stool sample may represent a solution. Diagnostic algorithms combining immunoassays and NAATs could also improve the specificity and reduce the global cost of this analysis.

摘要

核酸扩增技术 (NAATs) 代表了艰难梭菌 (C. difficile) 感染诊断的重大进展。本综述分析了用于艰难梭菌感染分子诊断的不同选择,以及 NAATs 的优缺点。比较了七种商业 NAATs 的性能 (BD GeneOhm Cdiff、Illumigene C. difficile、Xpert C. difficile、BD Max Cdiff、Portrait Toxigenic C. difficile、ProGastro Cd、Seeplex Diarrhea ACE)。NAATs 的灵敏度和快速性非常出色:应进一步努力区分感染和定植。报告粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌的 DNA 载量可能是一种解决方案。结合免疫测定和 NAATs 的诊断算法也可以提高特异性并降低这种分析的总体成本。

相似文献

1
Molecular methods in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: an update.分子方法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的应用:最新进展。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;13(7):681-92. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2013.829705.
2
Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile.商用分子检测方法在粪便中产毒艰难梭菌检测的比较:BD GeneOhm Cdiff、Xpert C. difficile 和 illumigene C. difficile。
J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Aug;90(2):83-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
3
Evaluation of Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000, and Illumigene C. difficile Assays for Direct Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens.对Xpert艰难梭菌检测试剂盒、BD MAX艰难梭菌检测系统、用于雅培m2000的IMDx艰难梭菌检测试剂盒以及Illumigene艰难梭菌检测试剂盒在粪便标本中直接检测产毒艰难梭菌的评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2016 Mar;36(2):131-7. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.2.131.
4
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the molecular approach.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:分子方法。
Future Microbiol. 2013 Dec;8(12):1587-98. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.129.
5
Comparison of the Verigene Clostridium difficile, Simplexa C. difficile Universal Direct, BD MAX Cdiff, and Xpert C. difficile assays for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile.用于检测产毒艰难梭菌的Verigene艰难梭菌检测法、Simplexa艰难梭菌通用直接检测法、BD MAX艰难梭菌检测法和Xpert艰难梭菌检测法的比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;80(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
6
Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs.BD Max艰难梭菌检测法与GenomEra艰难梭菌分子检测法在常规样本容器及粪便拭子中粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌检测方面的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2320-2. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
7
Evaluation of the BD Max Cdiff assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in human stool specimens.评估BD Max艰难梭菌检测试剂盒在检测人类粪便标本中产毒艰难梭菌方面的性能。
Pathology. 2015 Feb;47(2):165-8. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000214.
8
Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in pediatric stool samples: an evaluation of Quik Check Complete Antigen assay, BD GeneOhm Cdiff PCR, and ProGastro Cd PCR assays.检测儿科粪便样本中的产毒艰难梭菌:对 Quik Check Complete 抗原检测、BD GeneOhm Cdiff PCR 和 ProGastro Cd PCR 检测方法的评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;71(3):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
9
Evaluation of the new CE-IVD marked BD MAX Cdiff Assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile harboring the tcdB gene from clinical stool samples.评价新型 CE-IVD 标记的 BD MAX Cdiff 检测试剂盒在检测临床粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌 tcdB 基因的应用。
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Jul;94(1):58-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
Performance assessment of the BD MAX Cdiff assay in comparison to Xpert C. difficile assay in a setting with very low prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027.在产毒艰难梭菌PCR核糖体分型027极低流行率的环境中,将BD MAX艰难梭菌检测法与Xpert艰难梭菌检测法进行性能评估。
Anaerobe. 2014 Dec;30:156-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive approach for the patient with Clostridium difficile infection.针对艰难梭菌感染患者的综合治疗方法。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):27-31.
2
Performance comparison of the cobas Liat and Cepheid GeneXpert systems for Clostridium difficile detection.比较 cobas Liat 和 Cepheid GeneXpert 系统检测艰难梭菌的性能。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 24;13(7):e0200498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200498. eCollection 2018.
3
Accuracy of Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: A meta analysis.
Xpert艰难梭菌检测法诊断艰难梭菌感染的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0185891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185891. eCollection 2017.
4
Evaluation of Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000, and Illumigene C. difficile Assays for Direct Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens.对Xpert艰难梭菌检测试剂盒、BD MAX艰难梭菌检测系统、用于雅培m2000的IMDx艰难梭菌检测试剂盒以及Illumigene艰难梭菌检测试剂盒在粪便标本中直接检测产毒艰难梭菌的评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2016 Mar;36(2):131-7. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.2.131.