Suppr超能文献

Xpert艰难梭菌检测法诊断艰难梭菌感染的准确性:一项荟萃分析。

Accuracy of Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: A meta analysis.

作者信息

Bai Yuanyuan, Sun Xiaorong, Jin Yan, Wang Yueling, Li Juan

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, PR China.

Department of Pathology, Jinan Women and Children's Health Hospital, Jinan, PR China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0185891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185891. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need for rapid and accurate microbiological diagnostic assay for detection of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert Clostridium difficile assay (Xpert CD) for the diagnosis of CDI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies according to predetermined criteria. STATA 13.0 software was used to analyze the tests for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of included studies with RevMan 5.2. Heterogeneity in accuracy measures was tested with Spearman correlation coefficient and Chi-square.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence intervals [CI]) was 0.97 (0.95-0.99) and specificity was 0.95 (0.94-0.96). The AUC was 0.99 (0.97-0.99). Significant heterogeneity was observed when we pooled most of the accuracy measures of selected studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The Xpert CD assay is a useful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing toxigenic CDI, and this method has excellent usability due to its rapidity and simplicity.

摘要

背景

迫切需要快速准确的微生物诊断检测方法来检测艰难梭菌感染(CDI)。我们评估了Xpert艰难梭菌检测法(Xpert CD)对CDI诊断的准确性。

方法

我们根据预定标准检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库以识别研究。使用STATA 13.0软件分析检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断比值比以及汇总接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。使用QUADAS-2和RevMan 5.2评估纳入研究的质量。使用Spearman相关系数和卡方检验准确性测量中的异质性。

结果

共有22项研究纳入荟萃分析。合并敏感性(95%置信区间[CI])为0.97(0.95 - 0.99),特异性为0.95(0.94 - 0.96)。AUC为0.99(0.97 - 0.99)。当我们汇总所选研究的大多数准确性测量时,观察到显著的异质性。

结论

Xpert CD检测法是一种有用的诊断工具,在诊断产毒型CDI方面具有高敏感性和特异性,并且由于其快速性和简便性,该方法具有出色的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b4c/5633177/5469d53abc54/pone.0185891.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验