Suppr超能文献

18世纪科学新闻中的同行评审。

Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

作者信息

Kronick D A

机构信息

Briscoe Library, University of Texas, Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284.

出版信息

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1321-2.

PMID:2406469
Abstract

Although the beginnings of "peer review" are frequently associated with the Royal Society of London when it took over official responsibility for the Philosophical Transactions in 1752, antecedents of peer review practices go back to the 17th century. Despite the differences in the academic, social, intellectual, and economic environments of the 18th century and today, we can find interesting and instructive similarities in the way early editors defined and exercised their prerogatives and responsibilities. These concerns extend to ideas and practices that are closely related to what we call peer review or refereeing today.

摘要

虽然“同行评审”的起源常常与1752年接管《哲学汇刊》官方职责的伦敦皇家学会联系在一起,但同行评审实践的前身可以追溯到17世纪。尽管18世纪和当今的学术、社会、知识和经济环境存在差异,但我们可以在早期编辑定义和行使其特权与职责的方式中发现有趣且有启发性的相似之处。这些关注点延伸到了与我们如今所称的同行评审或审稿密切相关的理念和实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验