From the Departments of Surgery (J.M., D.M.S., T.M.S.), and Emergency Medicine (J.M.), National Study Center (J.A.K.), Shock, Trauma and Anesthesiology Research-Organized Research Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine (J.G.), Baltimore, Maryland.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):629-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a12b86.
Respiratory compromise and the need for tracheostomy are common after cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). The purpose of the study was to evaluate if admission American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score is associated with the need for tracheostomy following cSCI.
The trauma registry identified patients with isolated cSCI during a 3-year period. Patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score greater than 3 in other body regions were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, admission ASIA motor score, ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), anatomic level of injury, need for a tracheostomy, and length of stay (LOS). Logistic regression models were constructed to examine the effect of admission ASIA motor scores on the outcome of tracheostomy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine risk factors for time to tracheostomy.
A total of 128 patients were identified. Seventy-four patients had a tracheostomy performed on mean (SD) hospital Day 9 (4). Median admission ASIA motor score was 22.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 8-54). Median anatomic level of injury was 5 (IQR, 4-6). Patients requiring tracheostomy had significantly lower median admission ASIA motor score (9 [IQR, 3-17] vs. 57 [IQR, 30-77], p < 0.001) and were more likely to be an AIS A. There was no difference in median anatomic level of injury (5 [IQR, 4-5.8] vs. 5 [IQR, 4-6], p = nonsignificant). ASIA motor scores less than 10 had an unadjusted odds ratio for requiring tracheostomy of 56 (95 confidence interval, 7-426). Following adjustment for independent risk factors, the odds ratio for ASIA motor score less than 10 remained statistically significant at 22 (confidence interval, 3-180). Among patients with incomplete cSCI, ASIA motor scores increased significantly from AIS B to AIS D, while Injury Severity Score (ISS), LOS and intensive care unit LOS declined significantly. Of those patients without a tracheostomy, 100% had an ASIA motor score greater than 10, 98% had an ASIA motor score greater than 20, and 86% had an ASIA motor score greater than 25. Among patients with an ASIA motor score less than 10, 100% had a tracheostomy; among patients with an ASIA motor score less than 20, 96% had a tracheostomy. Among patients with a tracheostomy, 91% were an AIS B or C, while 85% of patients classified as AIS D did not have a tracheostomy.
Tracheostomy after cSCI is common. Lower admission ASIA motor score and "complete" cSCI are significantly associated with the need for tracheostomy. Anatomic level of injury was not associated with tracheostomy after cSCI. Classification of incomplete patients by AIS indicates that ASIA motor score may be used as a surrogate for grade of injury. When looking only at patients with an "incomplete" cSCI, those with an admission ASIA score of less than 10 should have an early tracheostomy. Those with an AIS D scale should not be considered for early tracheostomy.
Therapeutic/care management, level II.
颈椎脊髓损伤(cSCI)后常出现呼吸功能障碍和气管切开术的需求。本研究的目的是评估入院时美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)运动评分与 cSCI 后气管切开术的需求是否相关。
创伤登记处确定了 3 年内发生孤立性 cSCI 的患者。排除其他身体区域损伤严重程度评分(Abbreviated Injury Scale,AIS)大于 3 的患者。回顾病历以获取人口统计学资料、入院时 ASIA 运动评分、ASIA 损伤量表(AIS)、损伤的解剖水平、气管切开术的需求以及住院时间(Length of Stay,LOS)。构建逻辑回归模型以检查入院时 ASIA 运动评分对气管切开术结果的影响。拟合 Cox 比例风险模型以确定气管切开术时间的危险因素。
共确定了 128 名患者。74 名患者在平均(SD)住院第 9 天(4)进行了气管切开术。中位数入院 ASIA 运动评分 22(四分位距[IQR],8-54)。中位数解剖损伤水平为 5(IQR,4-6)。需要气管切开术的患者的中位入院 ASIA 运动评分显著较低(9[IQR,3-17]与 57[IQR,30-77],p<0.001),且更可能为 AIS A。解剖损伤水平的中位数无差异(5[IQR,4-5.8]与 5[IQR,4-6],p=非显著性)。ASIA 运动评分小于 10 的患者需要气管切开术的比值比为 56(95%置信区间,7-426)。在校正独立危险因素后,ASIA 运动评分小于 10 的比值比仍具有统计学意义,为 22(置信区间,3-180)。在不完全性 cSCI 患者中,ASIA 运动评分从 AIS B 显著增加到 AIS D,而损伤严重程度评分(Injury Severity Score,ISS)、LOS 和重症监护病房 LOS 显著下降。在未进行气管切开术的患者中,100%的患者 ASIA 运动评分大于 10,98%的患者 ASIA 运动评分大于 20,86%的患者 ASIA 运动评分大于 25。在 ASIA 运动评分小于 10 的患者中,100%需要进行气管切开术;在 ASIA 运动评分小于 20 的患者中,96%需要进行气管切开术。在进行气管切开术的患者中,91%为 AIS B 或 C,而 85%的 AIS D 患者未进行气管切开术。
cSCI 后气管切开术很常见。较低的入院 ASIA 运动评分和“完全”性 cSCI 与气管切开术的需求显著相关。解剖损伤水平与 cSCI 后气管切开术无关。通过 AIS 对不完全性患者进行分类表明,ASIA 运动评分可作为损伤程度的替代指标。仅观察“不完全”性 cSCI 患者时,入院 ASIA 评分小于 10 的患者应早期进行气管切开术。不应考虑 AIS D 级的患者进行早期气管切开术。
治疗/护理管理,2 级。